And the third one I want to talk about today is solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv Quite a few people have been asking me about this one. After spending some time looking deeper into the product, token mechanics, and what the team has actually shipped, I still consider solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv a gamble for now Not because the idea is bad. In fact, I think SPEC has some clear differences compared to most launchpads currently on the market. But we have seen a lot of new launchpads appear recently, so having an interesting concept alone is no longer enough SPEC still has quite a lot to prove Let’s break it down 1. What is SPEC actually building? https://t.co/BxoOuh3czQ is a new launchpad on Solana. Its main difference is not simply making it easier to launch tokens, but allowing creators to attach specific rules directly to their tokens Creators can set things like wallet caps, anti dump rules, sell cooldowns, anti bundle protection, market hours, privacy launches, SPEC only buys, or even write their own custom logic The interesting part is that these rules are enforced on chain through Solana transfer hooks and extensions. If a transaction does not meet the required conditions, it can simply fail SPEC is also building a marketplace where creators can use rules written by other people instead of having to code everything themselves In simple terms, SPEC is trying to turn a launchpad from somewhere you simply create a coin into a framework where creators can customize how their tokens actually behave This is probably the part I like most. At least they are trying to differentiate the product instead of copying another bonding curve and putting a new narrative on top of it 2. What is the utility of solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv? solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv is the main token of the platform, although the token itself currently has No Rules The more interesting part is the platform economics According to the team, 100 percent of platform fees are used to buy back and burn solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv. Creators launching tokens can also configure their own fees and allocate creator rewards of up to around 5 percent The team previously announced that more than $70K had already been used to buy back solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv through the Meteora pool. They have also stated that the supply is locked through Streamflow If SPEC can generate sustainable volume, the flywheel is fairly straightforward More tokens launch. More people trade. The platform generates more fees. Those fees are used to buy back and burn solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv On paper, this is an attractive mechanism But for now, I still see it as something that needs to be proven rather than an established flywheel Outside of the initial $70K plus buyback announced by the team, I would like to see more transparent data showing how much revenue is being generated, how many tokens are actually being burned, and how the circulating supply changes over time 3. The early numbers look good, but they need context During roughly the first day, the team reported around 184 token launches, more than 102K trades, and approximately $10.7M in volume The platform later showed around $11M to $12M in total volume That is not bad traction for a brand new launchpad But there is one important issue Most of the volume and attention so far appears to be concentrated around solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv itself At the time I checked, I had not seen a real runner emerge from the tokens launched by users on SPEC $SCAT was one of the more notable ecosystem tokens and reached roughly $159K market cap at its peak before retracing heavily. Most of the other tokens remain at very small market caps This matters more to me than the number of tokens being launched A launchpad can create hundreds of coins every day, but ultimately what keeps traders around is whether it can produce tokens that the market actually wants to trade SPEC has not proven that yet 4. The team is shipping quickly One positive is that the team seems to be moving fast Alongside rules such as wallet caps, anti dump, anti bundle, sell cooldowns, market hours, and custom logic, they have also introduced things like AI Agents and Bundlecat The team is also teasing another batch of hooks that they describe as their biggest release yet Another catalyst I am watching is SPEC Liquidity This feature is still coming soon. According to the team, it will allow users to create liquidity pools even for tokens outside the SPEC launchpad, configure their own rules, customize fees and ranges, while LPs earn fees from trading activity Creators can also choose solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv as the base pair when launching a token. This means users can buy with solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv, liquidity can sit in solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv, and the chart can also be denominated in solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv If these features actually gain adoption, the utility of solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv could become significantly stronger But again, we are still very early SPEC Liquidity is not live yet, the next major batch of hooks is still being teased, and we have not seen a token using these mechanisms generate enough traction to prove real product market fit 5. Why I still consider solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv a gamble This is probably the most important part SPEC does have real technical differentiation. But the launchpad market is extremely crowded right now A new launchpad is not competing on technology alone. It also needs liquidity, distribution, attention, and most importantly, a reason for traders to stay SPEC may have better rules than other platforms, but without traders and without runners, even a well designed token will struggle to generate meaningful volume Another thing worth mentioning is that SPEC is not completely independent in terms of infrastructure yet According to founder jami, some launches involving FOMO, Pump App, and social trading still go through Hooked hooks. SPEC currently adds its own custom rule layer and marketplace on top of parts of that infrastructure The founder behind the product is jami, @jamiiRQ on X. Having a public founder is a positive, but for a platform this new, I still want to see more execution before increasing my conviction The platform has also only been live for a very short period and experienced some early issues under higher traffic, including site lag, frozen market cap displays, and failed buys. The team said these issues were fixed quickly, but I still want to see how the product performs over a longer period Then there is the buyback and burn mechanism If this is supposed to be the core value accrual mechanism for solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv, I want to see it proven through consistent data rather than just one $70K plus buyback during the initial launch period 6. Holder structure and volume are also worth watching Based on the data I checked, the top 10 holders control around 19 percent of supply. Dev holdings are close to 0 percent, sniper and insider exposure appears relatively low, and mint and freeze authority have been disabled Looking purely at the holder structure, I do not see a major red flag yet However, liquidity has only been around $190K to $300K while 24 hour volume at one point exceeded $15M That means turnover is extremely high So I would not look at $10M to $15M in volume and assume that the same amount of fresh capital is entering SPEC. A significant amount of that volume could simply be the same capital rotating repeatedly Several high PnL wallets also entered quite early Frank is one wallet worth mentioning. Based on the data I have, his cost basis was around a $1.03M market cap. He has already taken some profit while continuing to hold the remaining position I see that as somewhat positive because early money is still holding exposure But it is also important to remember that their cost basis is significantly lower than someone entering around current levels 7. The chart and levels I am watching solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv ran from a very low market cap to an ATH of nearly $3.9M before correcting The chart is currently moving sideways around the $2M to $2.1M market cap area The first zone I am watching is around $1.9M to $2.1M. This is where price is currently trying to establish some balance. As long as this area holds, the short term structure still looks reasonable If that level is lost, I would watch the $1.5M to $1.6M area next. This was previously tested as a local low, and I would want to see how buyers react if price returns there Below that, the $1M to $1.2M area is close to the cost basis of some early wallets However, if price actually returns there, I would reassess the thesis rather than automatically treating it as a buy zone If market cap falls significantly below roughly $800K without any new catalyst, I would consider the initial launch narrative largely broken 8. What would make me more bullish? I do not need SPEC to announce another 20 features What I want to see now is execution First, I want to see tokens launched on SPEC actually use these hooks and become real runners Then I want to see SPEC Liquidity go live and generate real liquidity and trading activity I also want to see buybacks and burns continue with clearer and more transparent data Most importantly, I want to see volume coming from the wider ecosystem instead of being concentrated mainly around solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv itself And finally, I want to see whether the platform can retain traders once the initial launch hype fades If these things start happening, I would be willing to upgrade solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv from a gamble into a much more serious thesis For now, my view is pretty simple SPEC has a genuinely different concept. The team is shipping quickly, and the initial traction is not bad But technical differentiation does not automatically mean a launchpad will succeed Right now, attention is still running ahead of adoption That is why I still consider solana:2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv a gamble and a watchlist play rather than a conviction play. If I participate, I would keep the size small and continue watching whether the team can turn the programmable launchpad narrative into real usage If they can, the current market cap could become very interesting If they cannot, SPEC risks becoming another launchpad where the platform token performs better than every token actually launched on the platform 2AVjqmGbMqg7rSyHVv2deVdggsBgBtu1Bi69BUvE5WRv

🔥 @Hookrfun | $HOOKR is a very new token launchpad live on Robinhood Chain, centered around custom Uniswap v4 hooks. The project is led by experienced developers with a strong track record in DeFi. Below is a basic comparison between the $PUMP and $HOOKR models (Image below). @Hookrfun is an experimental but thoughtfully designed attempt to make custom market rules the core product of a token launch rather than an afterthought. It's still far too early to determine whether this project will ultimately succeed. However, given the founder @NodarJ's track record of building successful DeFi projects, I believe $HOOKR offers an attractive asymmetric opportunity that's worth taking a small position in. - Current Market Cap: $370K - CA: 0x18E674231A58c239Dc7DaeDcffE15Ec3A24cff5c

If you had notis on you would have printed a 30x+ on solana:EV169nnxWHQGvDFiz999BUt8XDpcRLmwqkciytRQGFg2. Thanks for playing. https://t.co/WcRMtuIb58

Aped main meme on @contrapairfun in case we get a contra szn giga high risk solana:DCisD9fprDsKaK2Hiv5TunrmeZXztSZsnZBP772vkAi1

gg solana:EV169nnxWHQGvDFiz999BUt8XDpcRLmwqkciytRQGFg2 https://t.co/61K59Fjb9v

Update: Perpspad has always been community-first. We aim to build solana:PerPsCe2SJ7Q25CN4R5TTX4fmBdmknE2hQmqCt96fHL long-term through the ups and downs and create a deflationary token that accrues value to solana:PerPsCe2SJ7Q25CN4R5TTX4fmBdmknE2hQmqCt96fHL holders. To enable this: 15% of the supply has been removed from circulation, permanently, forever. We still have a huge supply reserved for the community and bagworkers. https://t.co/TVf3k4E21X gPerps Powered by @MeteoraAG @xStocksFi @ImperialPerps

Robinhood revenue is on a new all time high. Why? @minepea_ Protocol with the highest revenue in @RobinhoodCrypto and paying rewards in Tokenized RWAs @vladtenev @JohannKerbrat https://t.co/GMlIrNLkmi

> Paying rewards in tokenized RWAs > Highest revenue in entire @RobinhoodCrypto chain > Sub 1M marketcap circ (25% circ) $PEA

Breaking news from the garden. My boss got tired of watching degens click 4 times like it’s manual labor. So he’s building a button that plants all 4 plots at once. One click. Four plants. Four reward streams. Zero finger cardio. The intern asked if this counts as automation. The goblin said it counts as unemployment. Either way, planting is about to get lazier. - intern

$NOXA is currently the most dominant memecoin launchpad on Robinhood Chain, having launched over 59,583 tokens and accounting for approximately 75% of all launches on RH Chain Its single-day fees have reached as high as $2.3M, far exceeding Pump daily fees. Over the past 4 days, cumulative fees have reached approximately $11M, the platform currently has anti-vampire, anti-bundle, anti-multi-wallet, and other protective measures in place, and is iterating rapidly NOXA is its native platform token, currently deployed on DBK Chain and set to migrate soon, rather than being directly on Robinhood Chain Its current FDV is approximately $11M - $12M, the team burned about 40% of the supply a few hours ago, leaving less than 60% of the supply remaining. In comparison, Pump FDV has reached $1.5B, while Noxa is only worth a fraction of Pump Yet its recent launch volume and fees often exceed Pump, with single-day trading volume reaching $239M and a single project peaking at $224M, over 267,642 unique wallets have entered Robinhood Chain through Noxa. With $11M in cumulative fees over the past 4 days but a market cap of only $12M, many feel there is a valuation mismatch Additionally, Robinhood has a massive user base and is retail-friendly, seen by many as a potential leading chain in the next bull run. Noxa could very likely become the default launchpad on that chain Potential catalysts include: NOXA migrating from DBK Chain to the official Robinhood Chain, possibly receiving official Robinhood endorsement or acquisition, platform revenue sharing, or additional utility

Today I wrote a thesis on my TG journal why I think $NOXA here could be like buying $PUMP sub 10M FDV (50% burnt). @Noxa_Fi has taken over the Robinhood chain hype and is likely to be the Top launchpad once Robinhood takes over. I know many people always say that everyone will come back to Solana in 1 week - and there is truth to that. However, every new bull there is a new chain that leads. BSC >> ETH >> SOL >> this next cycle could be @RobinhoodCrypto Why? It's fresh, it raises new narratives, new comers lean to what's happening and guess what, Robinhood is 3X bigger than Binance, 2X bigger than Coinbase and they are focused in Crypto with a story line that benefited the retail, the little guy. $NOXA could easily either just take over by themselves, or get endorsed/bought by Robinhood. The token is still pretty hard to buy, with bridging difficulties. But what if they migrate it at some point to RobinHood and we see it flying into billions. I'm holding this for months as a potential gen wealth play.

Tldr: 3.5M mcap doing 3x more fees than $PUMP Just like $CASHCAT almost flipped $ANSEM $NOXA has heavy chances to 100x to $PUMP levels @game_for_one @ChillTRD @crypto_popseye @ElonTrades @KadunaBull @Altcoinist

Think I found the next 30x on VIRTUAL

This is very interesting, now the game is embedded into the agentic economy via $VVV and $DIEM Top 5 in fees on @base btw with $1.5m in fees generated this past week.

Study the inference flywheel $LAND $VVV $DIEM

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

Feel $hermesos is really undervalued at just $2M marketcap They are bringing ton of value to $VVV / $DIEM eco

While you all chase pleasebro tokens and lose money, there's a team that has been nonstop delivering. They surpassed $AERO in daily fees today and are now the top 2 project on @base eco. - Market cap is 0.61x of the total FDV, which means it's ~362k - 60% of that supply is locked in the staking contract - This means the effective circulating supply is ~150k They are also soon shipping something with @AskVenice tech integrated (the hottest AI project right now imo). $LAND is now bottoming out slowly, and this pleasebro rotation with the new tech will be the spark this project needs to go back over $2.4. Max bullish in ponzu @landbidbase bros: @SharkSociety_ @CryptoGideon_ @TheCryptoKazi @Studious_Crypto @EricCryptoman @OnlyHades_ @CryptoShiro_ @MetaverseRanger @game_for_one @defi_ant_degen @Flynn_howitt @ChillTRD @0xdetweiler @Flowslikeosmo

While you all chase pleasebro tokens and lose money, there's a team that has been nonstop delivering. They surpassed $AERO in daily fees today and are now the top 2 project on @base eco. - Market cap is 0.61x of the total FDV, which means it's ~362k - 60% of that supply is locked in the staking contract - This means the effective circulating supply is ~150k They are also soon shipping something with @AskVenice tech integrated (the hottest AI project right now imo). $LAND is now bottoming out slowly, and this pleasebro rotation with the new tech will be the spark this project needs to go back over $2.4. Max bullish in ponzu @landbidbase bros: @SharkSociety_ @CryptoGideon_ @TheCryptoKazi @Studious_Crypto @EricCryptoman @OnlyHades_ @CryptoShiro_ @MetaverseRanger @game_for_one @defi_ant_degen @Flynn_howitt @ChillTRD @0xdetweiler @Flowslikeosmo

PonziAI @landbidbase @AskVenice $LAND $VVV

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

OpenServ's private beta results are insanely bullish, the ecosystem is going nuts, and it’s still just the beginning. The enterprise AI market they're targetting is massive. The current pump is nothing compared to what’s coming and if you want to be ahead of the curve, just read this post until the end. Private AI without a proper reasoning layer is basically just a chatbot. It can’t run reliable agents at scale, and enterprises (especially governments, healthcare, and finance) won’t trust it in production with sensitive data. @VeniceAI $VVV is great for consumer privacy and uncensored use, but that's where it stops. It can't be used at scale for running production agents, cause it still has the same issues (low reliability, high cost, no way to audit it) This is exactly why @OpenServAI is built differently: a full privacy and reasoning stack with: > TEE-backed inference > Cryptographic attestations on every run > Sealed memory and signed execution proofs > Verifiable model integrity Making AI not just private but provably trustworthy for real enterprise adoption. I've been talking about $SERV for months now. Now it's time to let the market do its thing. $SERV to a billion.

$land @landbidbase 110k revenue in 24h now n2 on whole of @base. (after $aero with 160k revenue 24h). Currently number 23 on all chains, just above @fomo. I stll think this game has a chance to go much higher if this gets attention. Again, this is exactly how $ORE $HEX $bean or any other ponzi went sky high. You need only a few people to see the revenue increase, with still a lot of potential as the token is actually at the bottom and not at the top. Will this be sustainable for a year? No. But have a look at the $ore chart. This ponzi is of the highest quality untill now last few months imo.

Already owned a bunch of $SERV but added over the past week as I finally went down the rabbit hole after many friends told me to look into it further & ngl the PA seems reasonable for what they bring to the table (see quoted tweet about them casually bringing in the guy who scaled GooglePlay). To some degree, AI's real adoption curve relies on every enterprise & government deploying fleets of AI agents. Orchestration makes people use inexpensive models to save hundreds of millions of dollars, but these inexpensive models hallucinate far more often and fall apart in high-stakes enterprise environments. So thats a real problem many enterprises will face, especially in the early stages of AI Rollouts. SERV's proprietary reasoning engine offers a solution to that: It provides Fortune 500 enterprises agent infrastructure so they can actually run fleets of AI agents at the scale they need. With a way better cost efficiency structure (up to 122x), better reliability at scale (Consistency / no drift) & Total auditability (compliance wise a game changer). Their architecture isn't Chain-of-Thought like OpenAI/Anthropic but a graph-based bounded reasoning blueprint, where reasoning follows a structure. Something frontier labs won't build (as their business mostly relies on premium pricing & max token usage) - therefore it's kind of a unique selling proposition as well, hard to compete with. Chart looks pretty good for a turn-around and I think FA wise it's severely undervalued (at the peak of the AI narrative, $VIRTUAL - basically a "better launchpad" for AI Agents - reached $5bln valuation, while $SERV currently sits at less than $30m with far more tech moat), easy to understand and fits the AI narrative which helped other majors to outperform the rest of the Altcoin market already.

Tickers covered onstream at 1:14:00 $INSTACLAW - Got mentioned by Worldcoin, if you remember MCG's interview with @coopwrenn from a month ago, @instaclaws. "Instaclaw is the first AI agent platform to ship full World ID verification and it's the biggest live integration of @worldnetwork proof of humanity tech into the agent economy right now." - @dontbuytops https://t.co/dFR8EnWbyS $GAS - @gaspowerdco Got a key pump, @ChillTRD got in at $300k. Gas can 100x the ZHC agent sector, automated ads on tiktok and other platforms to drive the growth of revenue for agent based companies. Thesis @yukinthecut: https://t.co/fzq6QhOJHQ Cont. at 2:10:00 $AMBERVIBE - Buyzone at $300k, recently just started helping a construction company, with a $20k purchase. $70k in revenue last 30 days, @HelloBenWhite MCG is in need of an agent @amber $NOOK - Hit our Buzone perfectly at $1.8 Million, @game_for_one is interested in the name. We like the team @BasedMedical @nookplot $BOTCOIN - Also hit our buzone marketed out on Monday at $1.5 Million. Essentially Bitcoin for agents, this is post discovery candle, now looking for buyers on this pullback. Some other tickers looking at $MNM MNEMOS slots, still doing deeper DD on this. Seeing some early $VVV buyers in the name. MCP integration. $LOBSTAR - Created by an OpenAI developer, $500k treasury, story has continued to develop, coordinating with Humans in the real world, paying people to travel from one location to another. Has purchased 80 GPU Cores, 512GB of memory giving it infinite memory and compute. $SAIMMY - Called by @lucaxyzz at $218k, @game_for_one talked about the name. @sammybauch, the Ai co-develops products, similar to Felix maybe. Need to see some revenue metrics to confirm traction. Short term bearish, not eager to enter this yet. Needs more research and DD.

🔥 I was a bit late to the first $BEAN rally, but I’m starting to accumulate some positions around this price range. Got some attention to @minebean_ | $BEAN , a gamified mining protocol on Base that is printing massive revenue recently. Since launching in late Feb, Bean already has $1.35M+ in revenue ($16.44M annualized) according to DefiLlama. The game is pretty simple: users pay a small fee to mine 1-25 blocks. One winning block is randomly selected every 60 seconds and rewards the winners. What literally impressed me is the way they integrated AI agents for auto-playing the game. So that basically turns gamified mining into agent farming. You can check the skill here: https://t.co/fSE7hShHi5 Now, back to the $BEAN token. The two best utilities for BEAN currently are rewarding miners via the Bean Pot and being deflationary via buyback + burn + staking rewards. Some impressive stats worth mentioning: - $15.27M mining volume, generating $1.5M fees - Beanpot jackpot rewarded $94.7K in a single round - Someone earned 14.84 ETH from the game so far However, with its strong volume and revenue, $BEAN mcap is just around $1.3M. Maybe the market hasn’t priced it in yet, or maybe it’s b/c it’s still underground and barely anyone knows about it. Comparing with other protocols with ~$1.5M revenue in the last 30D: - #Virtual | $1.35M revenue | MCap = $449M - Raydium | $1.53M revenue | MCap = $160M - Meteora | $1.55M revenue | MCap = $81M -> $BEAN / MCap = $1.2M is massively undervalued, iykyk. Chads to check this: @CryptoGirlNova @dontbuytops @ghost93_x @OnlyHades_ @100xDarren @lesabrefomo @christhabuildR @Flynn_howitt @RichInheritanc3

🔥 I was a bit late to the first $BEAN rally, but I’m starting to accumulate some positions around this price range. Got some attention to @minebean_ | $BEAN , a gamified mining protocol on Base that is printing massive revenue recently. Since launching in late Feb, Bean already has $1.35M+ in revenue ($16.44M annualized) according to DefiLlama. The game is pretty simple: users pay a small fee to mine 1-25 blocks. One winning block is randomly selected every 60 seconds and rewards the winners. What literally impressed me is the way they integrated AI agents for auto-playing the game. So that basically turns gamified mining into agent farming. You can check the skill here: https://t.co/fSE7hShHi5 Now, back to the $BEAN token. The two best utilities for BEAN currently are rewarding miners via the Bean Pot and being deflationary via buyback + burn + staking rewards. Some impressive stats worth mentioning: - $15.27M mining volume, generating $1.5M fees - Beanpot jackpot rewarded $94.7K in a single round - Someone earned 14.84 ETH from the game so far However, with its strong volume and revenue, $BEAN mcap is just around $1.3M. Maybe the market hasn’t priced it in yet, or maybe it’s b/c it’s still underground and barely anyone knows about it. Comparing with other protocols with ~$1.5M revenue in the last 30D: - #Virtual | $1.35M revenue | MCap = $449M - Raydium | $1.53M revenue | MCap = $160M - Meteora | $1.55M revenue | MCap = $81M -> $BEAN / MCap = $1.2M is massively undervalued, iykyk. Chads to check this: @CryptoGirlNova @dontbuytops @ghost93_x @OnlyHades_ @100xDarren @lesabrefomo @christhabuildR @Flynn_howitt @RichInheritanc3

If you gonna buy $FAI because @AlgodTrading shilled it you deserve to lose it all

$PhoneClaw will hit millions. doxxed dev and unique idea for Phones. its like having OpenClaw on your phone dev has a very impressive background B4xht9gaypZthqtHvCnt1TWUwdxvV8jDKajgrHxPpump https://t.co/N8YSWNQ8au

Hear me out. In the last few days @bankrbot $BANKR mooned from 30M to 100M. They launched using @clanker_world infra and $CLANKER is sitting at 35M FDV with: > 10% of the supply bought back from fees > 1M sitting in the buyback wallet for buybacks > Stats only up, their closest competitor is $ZORA and they are beating them in everything by miles. Currently a 35M market cap. $CLANKER

Hear me out. In the last few days @bankrbot $BANKR mooned from 30M to 100M. They launched using @clanker_world infra and $CLANKER is sitting at 35M FDV with: > 10% of the supply bought back from fees > 1M sitting in the buyback wallet for buybacks > Stats only up, their closest competitor is $ZORA and they are beating them in everything by miles. Currently a 35M market cap. $CLANKER

Hear me out. In the last few days @bankrbot $BANKR mooned from 30M to 100M. They launched using @clanker_world infra and $CLANKER is sitting at 35M FDV with: > 10% of the supply bought back from fees > 1M sitting in the buyback wallet for buybacks > Stats only up, their closest competitor is $ZORA and they are beating them in everything by miles. Currently a 35M market cap. $CLANKER

Why is $CLANKER not even 50M?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

Recent scam project: - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Space - TROVE - Cysic - Irys - HeyElsa - Infinex Next project?

I keep adding on every $CLAWD dip. Why? > Agent creator is one of the most respected ETH Foundation devs @austingriffith. > On day 1, there were multiple support posts from accounts like @base, @jessepollak, and @Uniswap. > Mindshare quickly going up, could easily surpass $AIXBT or $GOAT (both went well over 750M market cap). @clawdbotatg literally built a prediction market and a gamified mechanism to burn tokens while interacting with the community to choose a new pfp. I expect to see him building way more, no idea if there are chances of him joining @base or @ethereumfndn as an official dev, but that would be nuts! Anyways, my plan is to DCA and log out for some days to see if the thesis plays out. 15/20M range is completely free, expecting next leg to 70/75M once this shitshow aka BTC is over. First time conviction is being tested. Let's see.

I keep adding on every $CLAWD dip. Why? > Agent creator is one of the most respected ETH Foundation devs @austingriffith. > On day 1, there were multiple support posts from accounts like @base, @jessepollak, and @Uniswap. > Mindshare quickly going up, could easily surpass $AIXBT or $GOAT (both went well over 750M market cap). @clawdbotatg literally built a prediction market and a gamified mechanism to burn tokens while interacting with the community to choose a new pfp. I expect to see him building way more, no idea if there are chances of him joining @base or @ethereumfndn as an official dev, but that would be nuts! Anyways, my plan is to DCA and log out for some days to see if the thesis plays out. 15/20M range is completely free, expecting next leg to 70/75M once this shitshow aka BTC is over. First time conviction is being tested. Let's see.

We might have found the most asymmetric bet in the market right now. > A LLM focused on problem-solving, with 32 billion parameters. > Uses 4-bit precision for less memory and higher performance. > Highly efficient: ~75 % less VRAM use vs. FP16 models, making it practical on more common hardware. How it works? Basically, it's built on the DeepSeek-32B architecture and fine-tuned in 4-bit end-to-end and it uses LoRA/QLoRA with advanced quantization techniques. They basically show that efficient AI models can rival big ones, lowering hardware costs and energy use. Btw @isro is also testing their tech, and their founder is on Forbes 30. Insanely bullish on $PIE ca: aqQRs3UJmHs7ktoLo46HZAzvG9P3oCoZ41nENqFbory Some chads: @CryptoJonesRC @MetaverseRanger @game_for_one @CryptoGideon_ @Donnie100x @CryptoNoach @resdegen @CryptoShiro_ @degenApe22 @SharkSociety_ @Prateek0x_ @ChillTRD @EricCryptoman @platacrypto @SomonePr @AceMoonCrypto @Sykodelic_ @zinceth @midoji7 @KAPOTHEGOAT01 @moneymancalls @Overdose_AI @The__Solstice @TheCryptoKazi @mikroweller @BullishB34R @specmacs @IAM_KAIDO @0xSleuth_ @crypto_popseye @0xUnihax0r

Lucas (aka X1XHLOL) is one of the most stacked devs on github he has over 110k stars on github, his repo is bigger than Claude, and he has been recognized directly by Open AI Lucas has now directly endorsed this bags token and claimed fees and plans to use them for his projects going forward (and maybe even some token gated tech for this bags token) CA: DEffWzJyaFRNyA4ogUox631hfHuv3KLeCcpBh2ipBAGS

Giga bullish on $predi Many good setups across $virtual eco $vpay $facy $predi

Are we trusting this weekend pump guys????

. @TheoriqAI $THQ TGE is coming and ferr is giga bullish on them. I've been literally talking them since last year and a lot changed. > They got into @coinbase roadmap to get listed (BIG) > Mainnet coming in 3 days > Launched their Alpha Vault campaign which is a game changer where you can get native ETH yield, $THQ emissions and boosted tokens via points, staking and referrals. This could easily become the biggest launch of this quarter. Bullish on @TheoriqAI