The bug was seemingly written by Coinkite's Co-founder and CTO, Peter Gray @DocHex Well after the attack was in full swing, he first reposted nunchuck, where it became clear that Mk4, Mk5 and Q were also affected, and that Coinkite had confirmed it. Then, AFTER this, he reposts @TomerStrolight, saying it is not yet confirmed that MK4 entropy is breached.

Name & Symbol: Quack AI ($Q)
Address: 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589

The bug was seemingly written by Coinkite's Co-founder and CTO, Peter Gray @DocHex Well after the attack was in full swing, he first reposted nunchuck, where it became clear that Mk4, Mk5 and Q were also affected, and that Coinkite had confirmed it. Then, AFTER this, he reposts @TomerStrolight, saying it is not yet confirmed that MK4 entropy is breached.

Name & Symbol: Quack AI ($Q)
Address: 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589

Bitcoin's world-changing mission is to separate money and state. The signal the OP_RETURN uncap sent was unmistakable: Bitcoin Core is open for business for non-monetary use cases, to the point that the project will preemptively facilitate them while refusing any attempt to curb spam. Inscription ecosystems, ZK-rollups, and corporate non-monetary use cases take time and funding to develop. A Bitcoin Core that prioritises curbing spam does not invite the investment. A Bitcoin Core that has signalled the opposite does(invite the investment). The refusal to close the inscription loophole with Luke's filter patch and the merge of the institutional uncap PR sent a clear signal that future non-monetary activity in the Bitcoin mempool and blockchain from entities like Citrea can proceed with confidence. https://t.co/4ldVKyv3fE

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7

"The refusal to close the inscription loophole...and the merge of the institutional uncap PR sent a clear signal that future non-monetary activity...from entities like Citrea can proceed with confidence." NOT while I draw breath.

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7

On the wild plains of Bitcoin Twitter, two specimens of the Griftus Influencus ReplyGuyus genus are observed in their natural habitat. The first, the Loppus Corporatus, is a sleek, Citrea-backed predator with glowing eyes and a wallet full of Layer 2 dreams. It circles the neutral Jimmy Song with smug confidence. ‘You don’t know enough about Bitcoin…’ it hisses. Close behind lurks the elder Backus Andus, the silver-haired survivor of tropical island networking trips and famously generous mining notes yields. ‘Touché! Touché!’ he cackles, slapping his knee like a seal who’s just sold a pre-sale allocation and locked in sweet insider profits. Together they patrol the discourse on X, desperate to keep the herd in line and prevent potential independent thinkers wandering off the Core reservation.

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7

On the wild plains of Bitcoin Twitter, two specimens of the Griftus Influencus ReplyGuyus genus are observed in their natural habitat. The first, the Loppus Corporatus, is a sleek, Citrea-backed predator with glowing eyes and a wallet full of Layer 2 dreams. It circles the neutral Jimmy Song with smug confidence. ‘You don’t know enough about Bitcoin…’ it hisses. Close behind lurks the elder Backus Andus, the silver-haired survivor of tropical island networking trips and famously generous mining notes yields. ‘Touché! Touché!’ he cackles, slapping his knee like a seal who’s just sold a pre-sale allocation and locked in sweet insider profits. Together they patrol the discourse on X, desperate to keep the herd in line and prevent potential independent thinkers wandering off the Core reservation.

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7

«The signal the OP_RETURN uncap sent was unmistakable: Bitcoin Core is open for business for non-monetary use cases, to the point that the project will preemptively facilitate them while refusing any attempt to curb spam.» «The refusal to close the inscription loophole with Luke’s filter patch and the merge of the institutional uncap PR sent a clear signal that future non-monetary activity in the Bitcoin mempool and blockchain from entities like Citrea can proceed with confidence.»

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7

“GRRRRRR! STOP RUNNING NODES!!” -Tone Vays

Name & Symbol: NodeOps ($NODE)
Address: 0x2f714d7b9a035d4ce24af8d9b6091c07e37f43fb

Matt, you dismiss documented evidence as "LLM-induced psychosis" and claim LLMs can construct "evidence for any viewpoint you want". What you are not doing is engage with specifics. The screenshots are timestamped GitHub commits, IRC logs, and Optech newsletter pages. - AJ Towns joked publicly on IRC at 15:57 GMT on May 2, 2025, that he could add labels to the OP_RETURN uncap PR that had been locked to collaborators only 16 minutes earlier, and offered to publish a method for inscribing comments via GitHub label edits. The PR had been locked at Sanders's request immediately after filing. - Casey Rodarmor, lead architect of the Ordinals and Runes protocols, wrote on his own GitHub repository on February 12, 2025 that Bitcoin Core would lift the OP_RETURN standardness limit, and added that the Ordinals/Runes community "just shouldn't worry about it." The predicted outcome was delivered four months later, on June 9, 2025. - Marcel Hernandez requested on April 29, 2025 that Jameson Lopp, Citrea investor, disclose his Citrea conflict on the commissioned PR thread. The disclosure request was marked ABUSE and hidden. A subsequent comment from Bitcoin Mechanic defending the disclosure request was marked OFF-TOPIC and also hidden. - Optech Newsletter #263, published six days after PR #27832 merged, listed one Bitcoin Core change for the week (PR #27746) and did not list PR #27832. The recap podcast for #263, hosted by Mike Schmidt with Mark Erhardt and Peter Todd on August 10, 2023, walked through the newsletter on the same day. The documentation change was not mentioned in either the newsletter or the podcast. Todd was on the podcast specifically to discuss his separately-filed PR #28130 to remove the OP_RETURN limit. These events are not constructed by an LLM. They are produced by named human actors at documented moments. Use your favorite LLM. Show me the output that makes any of these misleading or unimportant. If LLMs can construct evidence for any viewpoint, the case against this article should be easy.

Name & Symbol: Citrea ($CTR)
Address: 0x11030f79109269d796fd0fb956d6244e502757f7