Update 3: Over the past 48 hours an entity initially funded by the LAB team deposited 18.4M LAB ($18.3M) to Aster and began selling LAB spot on the DEX which has caused the LAB price to drop another -54% from $1.2 to $0.55. From July 10 to 11 the entity began transferring LAB to three Aster deposit addresses and currently still holds another 81.5M LAB: 0xaad30cab22f772c1658b7845b5837d35bf3a467a 0x76ccfde9819500204985580d235dd8326fa0b241 0x628dd74f428a81cd34ece11331a7f1593f76047a The entity received 196M+ LAB from the LAB team in April 2026, transferred LAB to four Bitget deposit addresses, withdrew to ten addresses from May 11 to 12, and still holds 81.5M LAB.

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

How many retail investors lost funds due to the MemeCore teams $M manipulation? You are not welcome in the US go back to your home country. Only let in the US because one of your parents is a foreign billionaire. Not a single person would miss you if you disappeared tomorrow only your $$$.

Name & Symbol: MemeCore ($M)
Address: 0x22b1458e780f8fa71e2f84502cee8b5a3cc731fa

Update: After further analysis of the laundering it seems the sketchy MM / OTC & private key compromise are independent of one another and not related. Kind of funny if the team was pumping the token for weeks only to have gotten rekt shortly before the upcoming unlock later this month.

Name & Symbol: TokenFi ($TOKEN)
Address: 0x4507cef57c46789ef8d1a19ea45f4216bae2b528

@edgeX_exchange “We investigated ourselves and did not find ourselves guilty even though we control nearly the entire supply” https://t.co/78l9tT01WT

Name & Symbol: edgeX ($EDGE)
Address: 0x70f2eadf1ca1969ff42b0c78e9da519e8937cbaf

@edgeX_exchange We all know edgeX supply was being controlled by a few insiders with a low float. If you care about transparency at all you will name the counterparties / MM agreements which lead to these events. https://t.co/qn2LvNPg2H

Name & Symbol: edgeX ($EDGE)
Address: 0x70f2eadf1ca1969ff42b0c78e9da519e8937cbaf

“Again, the nominal amount is tiny, in the hundreds of k” >Court cases take months or years? >Now Zama wastes hours and $1k per hour on lawyers? >Now Zama lost trust from users? >ZAMA token dumped 10%? >Now they have to change contracts and get those audited? >Now users assets are not pegged? You’re causing lots of collateral damage for your measly RFV lawsuit play for profit.

Name & Symbol: Zama ($ZAMA)
Address: 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f

You are a clown. Patagon is not a victim you purposely buy up garbage protocols for civil lawsuits to profit. Zama an innocent protocol and all of its users were dragged into your legal case. You did not alert Zama or give them the chance to contest beforehand. This is the reality in the US: Arbitraging outdated laws and boomer judges who know little to nothing about tech cases. Guess this is expected when you are a bad actor who helped lose $93M from actual victims at Stream DeFi….

Name & Symbol: Zama ($ZAMA)
Address: 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f

A step in the right direction for Bitget if you transparently take action vs. only publish a blog post for positive PR. The community is still patiently waiting for the results of your investigation into RAVE and other recent incidents. Active MMs like DWF (SIREN), HSBG (RIVER) deserve to be held accountable. When a large % of spot activity occurs on Bitget for these tokens it begins to appear as if side deals were taken when there’s no action.

Name & Symbol: RaveDAO ($RAVE)
Address: 0x97693439ea2f0ecdeb9135881e49f354656a911c

A step in the right direction for Bitget if you transparently take action vs. only publish a blog post for positive PR. The community is still patiently waiting for the results of your investigation into RAVE and other recent incidents. Active MMs like DWF (SIREN), HSBG (RIVER) deserve to be held accountable. When a large % of spot activity occurs on Bitget for these tokens it begins to appear as if side deals were taken when there’s no action.

Name & Symbol: River ($RIVER)
Address: 0xda7ad9dea9397cffddae2f8a052b82f1484252b3

1/ An investigation into the opaque private loans/OTC, unilateral vesting changes, market maker coordination, unknown float, and >95% supply control behind $LAB's recent pump to $6B FDV. Here's why @LABtrade_ represents everything wrong with the current meta of retail extraction on major centralized exchanges.

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

1/ An investigation into the opaque private loans/OTC, unilateral vesting changes, market maker coordination, unknown float, and >95% supply control behind $LAB's recent pump to $6B FDV. Here's why @LABtrade_ represents everything wrong with the current meta of retail extraction on major centralized exchanges.

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

1/ An investigation into the opaque private loans/OTC, unilateral vesting changes, market maker coordination, unknown float, and >95% supply control behind $LAB's recent pump to $6B FDV. Here's why @LABtrade_ represents everything wrong with the current meta of retail extraction on major centralized exchanges.

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

4/ One of several loan contracts offered privately: 7.5%/month for 6 months. Borrower is a BVI shell, The Lab Management Ltd., signed by Vladimir (Vova) Sadkov as director. On default, repayment is in LAB (the native token) at "market price". Borrower address: 0xf09C19328C26088053a8c9CfB982427bafF2Bd0b Note: It's a draft contract from Q1 2026, but an unnamed source confirmed interest payments were made under similar terms.

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

Hello Gracy. The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE. While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot. Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further. Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it? (Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

Hello Gracy. The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE. While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot. Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further. Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it? (Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)

Name & Symbol: RaveDAO ($RAVE)
Address: 0x97693439ea2f0ecdeb9135881e49f354656a911c

Hello Gracy. The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE. While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot. Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further. Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it? (Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

Hello Gracy. The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE. While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot. Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further. Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it? (Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)

Name & Symbol: RaveDAO ($RAVE)
Address: 0x97693439ea2f0ecdeb9135881e49f354656a911c

Price manipulation now happens almost every week, with $LAB by @LABtrade_ becoming the latest pump-and-dump token while Bitget continues playing the usual CEX role. The LAB team, @vsadkovv, appears to control a significant portion of the supply. Wallets linked to the team still hold large allocations: 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd On April 8, a wallet linked to the team (0xe037) deposited 40M LAB worth $13.6M to Bitget: 0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191 The LAB price started pumping on May 1, but a week earlier wallets linked to the team deposited 96M LAB worth around $63M to Bitget: 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF This looks coordinated. Gas fees (0.14 BNB) were distributed a week earlier 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d The wallet below has also been aggressively buying $LAB on-chain and depositing to Gate and Bitget, including tokens like $SkyAI, which surged 1000% in the last 30 days: 0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C It has been weeks since @GracyBitget promised an investigation, yet there has been no public update. If platforms cannot conduct internal investigations, identify coordinated manipulation, or provide transparency on who is behind these activities, confidence in market integrity keeps declining. ZachXBT still has a reward open for credible intel that lead to identifying the actors behind this operation. Stay smart.

Name & Symbol: LAB ($LAB)
Address: 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a

Price manipulation now happens almost every week, with $LAB by @LABtrade_ becoming the latest pump-and-dump token while Bitget continues playing the usual CEX role. The LAB team, @vsadkovv, appears to control a significant portion of the supply. Wallets linked to the team still hold large allocations: 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd On April 8, a wallet linked to the team (0xe037) deposited 40M LAB worth $13.6M to Bitget: 0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191 The LAB price started pumping on May 1, but a week earlier wallets linked to the team deposited 96M LAB worth around $63M to Bitget: 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF This looks coordinated. Gas fees (0.14 BNB) were distributed a week earlier 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d The wallet below has also been aggressively buying $LAB on-chain and depositing to Gate and Bitget, including tokens like $SkyAI, which surged 1000% in the last 30 days: 0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C It has been weeks since @GracyBitget promised an investigation, yet there has been no public update. If platforms cannot conduct internal investigations, identify coordinated manipulation, or provide transparency on who is behind these activities, confidence in market integrity keeps declining. ZachXBT still has a reward open for credible intel that lead to identifying the actors behind this operation. Stay smart.

Name & Symbol: SKYAI ($SKYAI)
Address: 0x92aa03137385f18539301349dcfc9ebc923ffb10

overall, my bias is to be open minded when someone DMs me. Kim Jong Un reached out and said he was interested in onboarding people to zora. I told him he had a bad rap, bad actors aren’t tolerated on base, and he’d need to demonstrate positive impact. I was also willing to hear him out. - I connected him to jacob with an explicit warning - before they actually met, sahil "onboarded" Lazarus Group, and jacob moved too quickly to amplify - less than an hour later Lazarus Group revealed that he was in fact lying and a bad actor and zora removed the profile

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69