ACI continues to ship even during this period of holidays and active debate relative to @Aave IP and domain. Multiple AIPs are on the go specially: - PT April listing on Plasma instance - update of PT Feb e-mode to facilitate migration of maturity cc @pendle_fi and @ethena_labs - listing of USDG from @Paxos on Dec 25th and probable incentive starting in January - listing of syrupUSDC Team also perform multiple Masiv renews: - Ethena LL (@ethereum and @Plasma) - Masiv supply ETHx from @staderlabs - sGHO rewards have been distributed - @Celo Masiv rewards have been verified and will be distributed on the coming hours - Masiv incentive for users that supply syrupUSDT and borrow USDT @MapelFinance - Masiv Base borrow incentives - Masiv supply USDC on @SonicLabs Whatever the noise, our team is dedicated to shipping and defending what we believe is good for the best of Aave DAO. Much love and merry Christmas to token holders and Aave users! 🎁📷🎅 @AaveChan

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

XPL on Aave as collateral is now LIVE This is the best opportunity onchain for those looking to increase XPL capital efficiency without incurring taxable events or reducing exposure Traders may borrow Tether to earn elswhere >8%, effectively making holding XPL pay ±4%+ 👇

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

The MEV Capital USDC Market on Morpho has 12% exposure to xUSD, and there's 4.69M of liquidity to withdraw. You should do so ASAP, as the transaction to remove the xUSD Vault from NAV and socialize the losses went out 2d ago, and the timelock is 3d long. https://t.co/EQeJJ164KY Link to the vault: https://t.co/m0vyNCGeJN

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

ICYMI: @aave has currently ~$1.6 billion in active loans on its @Plasma deployment. https://t.co/vTq37nJpHA

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Aave Horizon is quietly becoming one of the most important markets in all of DeFi. Horizon is @aave's lending venue built for RWA, and the growth is explosive. In ten weeks, the market size went from almost nothing to over half a billion dollars. https://t.co/XtYV39VKJk

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

An Open Letter to @circle : It’s Time to Bring DeFi Yield Up to Speed Circle’s model is simple. Every dollar used to mint USDC is placed into U.S. Treasury bills or other low-risk instruments. Those reserves now earn roughly 4% annually. That yield is Circle’s core revenue stream. Over the past months, we’ve seen Circle share a fraction of this yield with a few key partners like Coinbase, Ethena, Spark and Morpho as they bootstrap stablecoin utility and liquidity. I will not discuss why Aave is not included there, I think it is only a political reason, and @lemiscate will be the best guy to close that topic and make the deal actually happen. These partnerships show that Circle understands the importance of aligning incentives, or are scared to lose those specific integrations. But they also raise a bigger question: if this model works for a few, why not make it the backbone of DeFi’s next growth phase? Stablecoins were born with three major use cases. The first is trading collateral. They are the foundation of every perpetual futures market, the fuel behind leverage. Yet, most of this activity happens in USDT, not USDC. Circle is losing share to Tether on the very battlefield that defined stablecoin dominance. The only place it is winning is on Hyperliquid but even there they are not showing much support and as we have seen earlier this year with USDH there are a lot of teams hungry to eat their lunch. The second use case is payments. This one is growing fast, cross-border transfers, fintech integrations, neobanks, purpose-built blockchains. Here, USDC is decent but Tether is a few steps ahead again, as we’ve seen the penetration of tether across the world emerging countries is much better than USDC and the successful launch of Plasma is another example of it. Circle’s regulatory clarity and global partnerships make it a very interesting choice for legitimate financial rails. This space will only expand, and USDC will benefit if they get up to speed, hopefully they are not betting 100% of that vertical on the Arc blockchain. The third, and perhaps most strategic use case, is credit and savings, the role of stablecoins as the base layer of DeFi lending markets. This is where the next wave of growth lies. @aave is the biggest venue where stablecoins generate organic demand and yield. But the lending rates for USDC don’t reflect the risk lenders are actually taking. Aave’s USDC and USDT pools are often referred to as the “risk-free rate” of crypto. Yet those rates underwrite smart contract risk, liquidity risk, oracle risk, collateral risk ; risks far higher than Treasury bills. Risk should always be compensated with higher yield. But in DeFi, it has been the opposite for some part of the DeFi cycles: lenders could earn less than Circle earns on their cash. That imbalance limits growth and caps liquidity. Today, the bottleneck in DeFi isn’t demand for borrowing, it’s the lack of lenders. The system can’t scale if there’s no fresh stablecoin supply to meet leveraged demand. Even as Aave reached $75 billion in deposits earlier this year which is a huge number and actually the biggest the space has ever seen but this is still too small. Supply caps are hit repeatedly, borrow rates can still spike for assets like ETH, USDT, and USDC (much less than any other lending venue of course because we don't have curators trying to squeeze rates as high as possible) revealing the same underlying issue: the space is too small. Stablecoin lenders are the cornerstone of this ecosystem. They provide the cheapest cost of capital, the foundation upon which every other use case depends. But they’re also the most conservative users in the riskiest industry. To attract them, DeFi needs something compelling, something that justifies taking that risk. That something could come from Circle. A simple revenue-sharing model (say, 50% of the yield from Treasury reserves distributed to USDC lenders on Aave) would instantly raise the bar. It would increase USDC lending rates by around 50% with zero dilution. More importantly, it would create a permanent yield floor: the risk-free yield of DeFi would always sit above the risk-free yield of TradFi. The implications are huge. Aave’s aUSDC would become the most attractive saving product in crypto, backed indirectly by U.S. Treasuries and powered by organic market demand. Institutional allocators looking for stable yield would find a very compelling reason to deploy into DeFi rather than T-bills. The question would no longer be, “Why park USDC on Aave when I can earn close to the same in Treasuries?” It would become, “Why park dollars in Treasuries when I can earn twice as much with USDC on Aave?” Circle would not be giving up revenue, it would be creating it. Higher yields attract more lenders, which drives more USDC issuance, which expands reserves, which increases total income. This feedback loop could multiply USDC’s market share while positioning Circle as the architect of DeFi’s first truly sustainable yield ecosystem. At a time when regulatory clarity is improving, institutional interest is rising, and Tether still dominates the trading layer, Circle has an opportunity to flip the narrative through DeFi. By anchoring the safest yield in DeFi above the safest yield in TradFi, you would make USDC the stablecoin of choice. If Circle doesn’t seize this opportunity, someone else will. Market shares are for the taking for the ones hungry for it. Still day one so invest in growth, Aave is growth. Just Use Aave.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

An Open Letter to @circle : It’s Time to Bring DeFi Yield Up to Speed Circle’s model is simple. Every dollar used to mint USDC is placed into U.S. Treasury bills or other low-risk instruments. Those reserves now earn roughly 4% annually. That yield is Circle’s core revenue stream. Over the past months, we’ve seen Circle share a fraction of this yield with a few key partners like Coinbase, Ethena, Spark and Morpho as they bootstrap stablecoin utility and liquidity. I will not discuss why Aave is not included there, I think it is only a political reason, and @lemiscate will be the best guy to close that topic and make the deal actually happen. These partnerships show that Circle understands the importance of aligning incentives, or are scared to lose those specific integrations. But they also raise a bigger question: if this model works for a few, why not make it the backbone of DeFi’s next growth phase? Stablecoins were born with three major use cases. The first is trading collateral. They are the foundation of every perpetual futures market, the fuel behind leverage. Yet, most of this activity happens in USDT, not USDC. Circle is losing share to Tether on the very battlefield that defined stablecoin dominance. The only place it is winning is on Hyperliquid but even there they are not showing much support and as we have seen earlier this year with USDH there are a lot of teams hungry to eat their lunch. The second use case is payments. This one is growing fast, cross-border transfers, fintech integrations, neobanks, purpose-built blockchains. Here, USDC is decent but Tether is a few steps ahead again, as we’ve seen the penetration of tether across the world emerging countries is much better than USDC and the successful launch of Plasma is another example of it. Circle’s regulatory clarity and global partnerships make it a very interesting choice for legitimate financial rails. This space will only expand, and USDC will benefit if they get up to speed, hopefully they are not betting 100% of that vertical on the Arc blockchain. The third, and perhaps most strategic use case, is credit and savings, the role of stablecoins as the base layer of DeFi lending markets. This is where the next wave of growth lies. @aave is the biggest venue where stablecoins generate organic demand and yield. But the lending rates for USDC don’t reflect the risk lenders are actually taking. Aave’s USDC and USDT pools are often referred to as the “risk-free rate” of crypto. Yet those rates underwrite smart contract risk, liquidity risk, oracle risk, collateral risk ; risks far higher than Treasury bills. Risk should always be compensated with higher yield. But in DeFi, it has been the opposite for some part of the DeFi cycles: lenders could earn less than Circle earns on their cash. That imbalance limits growth and caps liquidity. Today, the bottleneck in DeFi isn’t demand for borrowing, it’s the lack of lenders. The system can’t scale if there’s no fresh stablecoin supply to meet leveraged demand. Even as Aave reached $75 billion in deposits earlier this year which is a huge number and actually the biggest the space has ever seen but this is still too small. Supply caps are hit repeatedly, borrow rates can still spike for assets like ETH, USDT, and USDC (much less than any other lending venue of course because we don't have curators trying to squeeze rates as high as possible) revealing the same underlying issue: the space is too small. Stablecoin lenders are the cornerstone of this ecosystem. They provide the cheapest cost of capital, the foundation upon which every other use case depends. But they’re also the most conservative users in the riskiest industry. To attract them, DeFi needs something compelling, something that justifies taking that risk. That something could come from Circle. A simple revenue-sharing model (say, 50% of the yield from Treasury reserves distributed to USDC lenders on Aave) would instantly raise the bar. It would increase USDC lending rates by around 50% with zero dilution. More importantly, it would create a permanent yield floor: the risk-free yield of DeFi would always sit above the risk-free yield of TradFi. The implications are huge. Aave’s aUSDC would become the most attractive saving product in crypto, backed indirectly by U.S. Treasuries and powered by organic market demand. Institutional allocators looking for stable yield would find a very compelling reason to deploy into DeFi rather than T-bills. The question would no longer be, “Why park USDC on Aave when I can earn close to the same in Treasuries?” It would become, “Why park dollars in Treasuries when I can earn twice as much with USDC on Aave?” Circle would not be giving up revenue, it would be creating it. Higher yields attract more lenders, which drives more USDC issuance, which expands reserves, which increases total income. This feedback loop could multiply USDC’s market share while positioning Circle as the architect of DeFi’s first truly sustainable yield ecosystem. At a time when regulatory clarity is improving, institutional interest is rising, and Tether still dominates the trading layer, Circle has an opportunity to flip the narrative through DeFi. By anchoring the safest yield in DeFi above the safest yield in TradFi, you would make USDC the stablecoin of choice. If Circle doesn’t seize this opportunity, someone else will. Market shares are for the taking for the ones hungry for it. Still day one so invest in growth, Aave is growth. Just Use Aave.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

An Open Letter to @circle : It’s Time to Bring DeFi Yield Up to Speed Circle’s model is simple. Every dollar used to mint USDC is placed into U.S. Treasury bills or other low-risk instruments. Those reserves now earn roughly 4% annually. That yield is Circle’s core revenue stream. Over the past months, we’ve seen Circle share a fraction of this yield with a few key partners like Coinbase, Ethena, Spark and Morpho as they bootstrap stablecoin utility and liquidity. I will not discuss why Aave is not included there, I think it is only a political reason, and @lemiscate will be the best guy to close that topic and make the deal actually happen. These partnerships show that Circle understands the importance of aligning incentives, or are scared to lose those specific integrations. But they also raise a bigger question: if this model works for a few, why not make it the backbone of DeFi’s next growth phase? Stablecoins were born with three major use cases. The first is trading collateral. They are the foundation of every perpetual futures market, the fuel behind leverage. Yet, most of this activity happens in USDT, not USDC. Circle is losing share to Tether on the very battlefield that defined stablecoin dominance. The only place it is winning is on Hyperliquid but even there they are not showing much support and as we have seen earlier this year with USDH there are a lot of teams hungry to eat their lunch. The second use case is payments. This one is growing fast, cross-border transfers, fintech integrations, neobanks, purpose-built blockchains. Here, USDC is decent but Tether is a few steps ahead again, as we’ve seen the penetration of tether across the world emerging countries is much better than USDC and the successful launch of Plasma is another example of it. Circle’s regulatory clarity and global partnerships make it a very interesting choice for legitimate financial rails. This space will only expand, and USDC will benefit if they get up to speed, hopefully they are not betting 100% of that vertical on the Arc blockchain. The third, and perhaps most strategic use case, is credit and savings, the role of stablecoins as the base layer of DeFi lending markets. This is where the next wave of growth lies. @aave is the biggest venue where stablecoins generate organic demand and yield. But the lending rates for USDC don’t reflect the risk lenders are actually taking. Aave’s USDC and USDT pools are often referred to as the “risk-free rate” of crypto. Yet those rates underwrite smart contract risk, liquidity risk, oracle risk, collateral risk ; risks far higher than Treasury bills. Risk should always be compensated with higher yield. But in DeFi, it has been the opposite for some part of the DeFi cycles: lenders could earn less than Circle earns on their cash. That imbalance limits growth and caps liquidity. Today, the bottleneck in DeFi isn’t demand for borrowing, it’s the lack of lenders. The system can’t scale if there’s no fresh stablecoin supply to meet leveraged demand. Even as Aave reached $75 billion in deposits earlier this year which is a huge number and actually the biggest the space has ever seen but this is still too small. Supply caps are hit repeatedly, borrow rates can still spike for assets like ETH, USDT, and USDC (much less than any other lending venue of course because we don't have curators trying to squeeze rates as high as possible) revealing the same underlying issue: the space is too small. Stablecoin lenders are the cornerstone of this ecosystem. They provide the cheapest cost of capital, the foundation upon which every other use case depends. But they’re also the most conservative users in the riskiest industry. To attract them, DeFi needs something compelling, something that justifies taking that risk. That something could come from Circle. A simple revenue-sharing model (say, 50% of the yield from Treasury reserves distributed to USDC lenders on Aave) would instantly raise the bar. It would increase USDC lending rates by around 50% with zero dilution. More importantly, it would create a permanent yield floor: the risk-free yield of DeFi would always sit above the risk-free yield of TradFi. The implications are huge. Aave’s aUSDC would become the most attractive saving product in crypto, backed indirectly by U.S. Treasuries and powered by organic market demand. Institutional allocators looking for stable yield would find a very compelling reason to deploy into DeFi rather than T-bills. The question would no longer be, “Why park USDC on Aave when I can earn close to the same in Treasuries?” It would become, “Why park dollars in Treasuries when I can earn twice as much with USDC on Aave?” Circle would not be giving up revenue, it would be creating it. Higher yields attract more lenders, which drives more USDC issuance, which expands reserves, which increases total income. This feedback loop could multiply USDC’s market share while positioning Circle as the architect of DeFi’s first truly sustainable yield ecosystem. At a time when regulatory clarity is improving, institutional interest is rising, and Tether still dominates the trading layer, Circle has an opportunity to flip the narrative through DeFi. By anchoring the safest yield in DeFi above the safest yield in TradFi, you would make USDC the stablecoin of choice. If Circle doesn’t seize this opportunity, someone else will. Market shares are for the taking for the ones hungry for it. Still day one so invest in growth, Aave is growth. Just Use Aave.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

An Open Letter to @circle : It’s Time to Bring DeFi Yield Up to Speed Circle’s model is simple. Every dollar used to mint USDC is placed into U.S. Treasury bills or other low-risk instruments. Those reserves now earn roughly 4% annually. That yield is Circle’s core revenue stream. Over the past months, we’ve seen Circle share a fraction of this yield with a few key partners like Coinbase, Ethena, Spark and Morpho as they bootstrap stablecoin utility and liquidity. I will not discuss why Aave is not included there, I think it is only a political reason, and @lemiscate will be the best guy to close that topic and make the deal actually happen. These partnerships show that Circle understands the importance of aligning incentives, or are scared to lose those specific integrations. But they also raise a bigger question: if this model works for a few, why not make it the backbone of DeFi’s next growth phase? Stablecoins were born with three major use cases. The first is trading collateral. They are the foundation of every perpetual futures market, the fuel behind leverage. Yet, most of this activity happens in USDT, not USDC. Circle is losing share to Tether on the very battlefield that defined stablecoin dominance. The only place it is winning is on Hyperliquid but even there they are not showing much support and as we have seen earlier this year with USDH there are a lot of teams hungry to eat their lunch. The second use case is payments. This one is growing fast, cross-border transfers, fintech integrations, neobanks, purpose-built blockchains. Here, USDC is decent but Tether is a few steps ahead again, as we’ve seen the penetration of tether across the world emerging countries is much better than USDC and the successful launch of Plasma is another example of it. Circle’s regulatory clarity and global partnerships make it a very interesting choice for legitimate financial rails. This space will only expand, and USDC will benefit if they get up to speed, hopefully they are not betting 100% of that vertical on the Arc blockchain. The third, and perhaps most strategic use case, is credit and savings, the role of stablecoins as the base layer of DeFi lending markets. This is where the next wave of growth lies. @aave is the biggest venue where stablecoins generate organic demand and yield. But the lending rates for USDC don’t reflect the risk lenders are actually taking. Aave’s USDC and USDT pools are often referred to as the “risk-free rate” of crypto. Yet those rates underwrite smart contract risk, liquidity risk, oracle risk, collateral risk ; risks far higher than Treasury bills. Risk should always be compensated with higher yield. But in DeFi, it has been the opposite for some part of the DeFi cycles: lenders could earn less than Circle earns on their cash. That imbalance limits growth and caps liquidity. Today, the bottleneck in DeFi isn’t demand for borrowing, it’s the lack of lenders. The system can’t scale if there’s no fresh stablecoin supply to meet leveraged demand. Even as Aave reached $75 billion in deposits earlier this year which is a huge number and actually the biggest the space has ever seen but this is still too small. Supply caps are hit repeatedly, borrow rates can still spike for assets like ETH, USDT, and USDC (much less than any other lending venue of course because we don't have curators trying to squeeze rates as high as possible) revealing the same underlying issue: the space is too small. Stablecoin lenders are the cornerstone of this ecosystem. They provide the cheapest cost of capital, the foundation upon which every other use case depends. But they’re also the most conservative users in the riskiest industry. To attract them, DeFi needs something compelling, something that justifies taking that risk. That something could come from Circle. A simple revenue-sharing model (say, 50% of the yield from Treasury reserves distributed to USDC lenders on Aave) would instantly raise the bar. It would increase USDC lending rates by around 50% with zero dilution. More importantly, it would create a permanent yield floor: the risk-free yield of DeFi would always sit above the risk-free yield of TradFi. The implications are huge. Aave’s aUSDC would become the most attractive saving product in crypto, backed indirectly by U.S. Treasuries and powered by organic market demand. Institutional allocators looking for stable yield would find a very compelling reason to deploy into DeFi rather than T-bills. The question would no longer be, “Why park USDC on Aave when I can earn close to the same in Treasuries?” It would become, “Why park dollars in Treasuries when I can earn twice as much with USDC on Aave?” Circle would not be giving up revenue, it would be creating it. Higher yields attract more lenders, which drives more USDC issuance, which expands reserves, which increases total income. This feedback loop could multiply USDC’s market share while positioning Circle as the architect of DeFi’s first truly sustainable yield ecosystem. At a time when regulatory clarity is improving, institutional interest is rising, and Tether still dominates the trading layer, Circle has an opportunity to flip the narrative through DeFi. By anchoring the safest yield in DeFi above the safest yield in TradFi, you would make USDC the stablecoin of choice. If Circle doesn’t seize this opportunity, someone else will. Market shares are for the taking for the ones hungry for it. Still day one so invest in growth, Aave is growth. Just Use Aave.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

According to (@lemiscate) Marc Zeller in his recent post, founder of Aave Chan: “DeFi has two paths for growth. •Bend the knee to TradFi and banks •Launch regulated products and eat the banks at their own game. I’m much more excited by the second path. Just use Aave.” What does this mean? 🤔 Some DeFi projects are starting to rely on banks and traditional finance for approval, liquidity, or regulation. They’re bending the knee, losing their independence bit by bit. In one of his interviews tittle “DeFi is for everyone”.. I completely agree. And now, Aave is taking a different route. They’re building regulated DeFi products , on their own terms. Meaning: ✅ They follow the rules ✅ But they don’t depend on banks ✅ And they still stay fully onchain Examples? •Aave Arc: a permissioned version for institutions •GHO Stablecoin: a decentralized, transparent alternative to bank-issued money Both are part of Aave’s mission to make DeFi safe, legal, and global, without giving up control. So when Marc says, “Just use Aave,” He’s saying: You don’t have to wait for banks to join DeFi. You can already access fair, open, and compliant finance, right here. Aave isn’t trying to be the next bank. They’re building the alternative. That’s the path to real financial freedom. Once again, ser @lemiscate and ser @StaniKulechov are not here to joke but to take DeFi to the biggest level.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Ledger is a great hardware company run by a bunch of max extract sociopaths allowing their greed to hurt their own business. Just use @safe.

Name & Symbol: Safe Token ($SAFE)
Address: 0x5afe3855358e112b5647b952709e6165e1c1eeee

Looks like @Plasma will be hot these following weeks. 🥵 - Listing of wstETH from @LidoFinance - Listing of wrsETH from @KelpDAO - Listing of PTs USDe and sUSDe from @ethena_labs and @pendle_fi - Listing of syrupUSDT from @maplefinance - Start of GHO @Aave stablecoin on Plasma Millions that will become billions in a few weeks. If you enter these assets, don’t forget to enable your e-mode. I also spotted a proposal to enable @0xfluid to do free flash loans. 👀 👀 Aave v3 is still improving, and a V3.6 introduces multiple gas optimizations based on users' activities. For example, liquidation will be more gas-efficient.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Grayscale Releases Rebalancing of Multi-Asset Fund for Q3 2025 According to a report from Golden Finance, Grayscale Investments announced on October 8 that the company has rebalanced its multi-asset fund; DeFi Fund, Smart Contract Fund (GSC), and Decentralized AI Fund (AI Fund) for Q3 2025. The DeFi Fund removed MakerDAO (MKR) and added Aerodrome Finance (AERO), with major holdings including Aave. Grayscale stated that the weight of constituent assets in each fund will be adjusted periodically according to indices or fund methodologies. ┉┈┈┈◈◉◈┈┈┈┉ Facing how @aave made the call among top assets like Ethereum, Solana and many more is because $AAVE momentum is strong and probably because of recent activities happening around the eco like: → Total deposits hitting an ATH of $75B → Ranking at #36 among U.S. banks by total deposits → $GHO usage on Ethereum is at an ATH, up ~40x since Jan 24 → Captures 70% of all lending deposits on Ethereum → Leading the game on Plasma with nearly $7B TVL ┉┈┈┈◈◉◈┈┈┈┉ Also, Aave V4 will be launching in this fourth quarter, introducing a {central radiation} architecture aimed at centralizing the liquidity of $AAVE TVL ecosystem, providing shared pools for diversified lending markets such as PENDLE, UNI, and sUSDe. I believe this V4 modular design should allow customized risk parameters while eliminating liquidity fragmentation, which could position it as the operating system and global leader of DeFi This way, Aave will foster innovation and avoid competition in the future.

Name & Symbol: Aerodrome ($AERO)
Address: 0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631

Aave on Plasma has been the fastest growing Aave market ever, becoming second largest in mere days. And it's now live at DeFi Saver. Starting today you can manage @aave positions on @plasma using DFS, including our signature leverage management and other tools - details below. https://t.co/HFhLi9zhQ9

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

In less than a week @Plasma is now larger than @base Green eats blue Coin it. https://t.co/f0OehrMmaf

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

In less than a week @Plasma is now larger than @base Green eats blue Coin it. https://t.co/CfdQonPl1w

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

1/ 11 days ago, @lemiscate stressed in the Aave governance forums the importance of focusing resources on networks with true differentiators. Yesterday’s launch on Plasma proves the point: in just 24 hours Aave generated $57K in interest — more than Aave's deployments on Scroll & Gnosis in 2 weeks, more than Celo in a quarter, and more than zkSync since March.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Friday bull post: @aave is the first DeFi protocol to hit $1B+ deposits across 6 networks. @Plasma became the 6th after attracting $4B in 24 hours. https://t.co/6SThNTVIsT

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Plasma is all the rage right now, but we also have excellent USDT yield to grab on mainnet Core for LPs that don't want to bridge. Just Use Aave. https://t.co/Kbegei715l

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Everything is coming onchain: trading @Uniswap lending @aave USD @Tether_to private market funds @Securitize prediction markets @Polymarket consumer social @zora stocks @SuperstateInc identity @worldcoin games @Ronin_Network AI @bittensor

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Plasma is the second-ever network to join the exclusive 3 billy club. Trillions. https://t.co/FY2OEWDE4P

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Claiming to be ready for institutions means nothing without facts to back it up. ► Aave is secured by 5 independent layers of protection: 1️⃣ @AaveChan / @chaos_labs / @LlamaRisk / Aave Labs the team proposing an update on the governance forum 2️⃣ @bgdlabs to review the code and maintain the protocol infrastructure 3️⃣ @CertoraInc continuous security service for smart contract auditing 4️⃣ Guardian Role: community-elected and able to act quickly if needed, for example by pausing markets, with their mandate renewed periodically through governance. 5️⃣ Umbrella Coverage to automatically protect the protocol against bad debt: unlike others that socialize bad debt among users, Aave has a dedicated module for this, backed by capital from users who accept the risk of being slashed. On top of that, Aave adopted the SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement, which monitors users' positions and allows whitehats to intervene during active exploits to recover funds, with clear legal protection and a predefined rescue process. There's also Aave Seatbelt, a tool that forks mainnet to simulate the execution of governance proposals and generates a report with all state changes, triggered events, and a human-readable summary of the impact. This process ensures that every AIP passes through multiple checkpoints before execution, minimizing the chances of critical failure. Each layer covers for potential gaps in others, creating a strong and resilient defense that significantly reduces the chances of failure. This stands in stark contrast to Morpho, which relies on a single layer of protection, risk curators, while Aave is secured by 5 independent layers. One mistake, and there is nothing left to absorb the impact. That’s what makes Aave the safest and largest dApp, representing a significant share of all DeFi. It shows an unparalleled and relentless focus on the safety of users' funds.

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2