Want to model how token unlocks affect price? Sell Pressure lets you stress test your token's unlock schedule against different liquidity conditions and selling behaviors for free. Here's how it works. https://t.co/QGFhJbv6dR

Name & Symbol: TokenFi ($TOKEN)
Address: 0x4507cef57c46789ef8d1a19ea45f4216bae2b528

Congrats to DoubleZero on the launch today. One of the coolest truly novel net new primitives I’ve seen in crypto recently Disclaimer: Delphi Ventures is a proud investor in 2Z

Name & Symbol: DoubleZero ($2Z)
Address: J6pQQ3FAcJQeWPPGppWRb4nM8jU3wLyYbRrLh7feMfvd

Finally had a chance to listen to this interview on a long flight with no distractions And I think I absorbed the key point which is IF a platform can pay small creators AND be profitable, it will be huge - not crypto huge, but internet huge Long $PUMP

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

pump is outperforming all majors & comps since ico https://t.co/ASxDhJSC8c

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

Delphi subscription continues to pay for itself with people like @that1618guy doing TA, @0xLTR calling Mantle, @simononchain beating the drum on $PUMP nonstop, and the rest of the research team cooking 24/7

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

charts im interested in rebuying on a pullback - $PUMP - $MNT - $AVAX - $SOL Will share some TA on these shortly 👀

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

$PUMP and $HYPE are crypto's biggest revenue generators, each using ~100% of revenue to buy back their tokens at current market caps (using trailing 30d numbers) pump is buying back nearly 3% of its unlocked supply each month, while hyperliquid is buying back ~0.7% annualized - pump is effectively removing 34% of current market cap from circulation while HL is doing about 8.4% expecting pump to continue to rerate higher and for these multiples to converge, albeit hype will likely still trade at a premium with competitors unable to retain volumes and market share, pump has cemented itself as the launchpad leader and can sell their grander vision without challengers muddying the waters clear market dominance makes it easier for participants to buy in and for PUMP to expand valuation potential as they sell bigger ambitions beyond just being the dominant launchpad

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

Everyone knows @a1lon9 But @pumpdotfun actually has three co-founders We hosted @sapijiju for his first-ever conversation about $PUMP Timestamps 0:00 Intro & Noah's Crypto Journey 7:15 Learning from Failure to Product Market Fit 11:20 Crypto's Lack of Innovation 16:30 Current Creator Models are Broken 18:00 Pump's Content Vision 23:00 Pump as a Product First Operation 25:00 Growing the Pie for Streaming 29:00 Innovating on Content Distribution 34:00 Letting Content Grow Organically 37:40 +$1.5B worth of SOL is locked in Pump Liquidity Pools 40:20 Creating a Global Impact with Pump 42:20 What could Pump do with its Warchest? 47:00 The Pump Buybacks 51:00 Why People use Pump 54:00 The Culture Shift of Crypto 57:00 Traditional models no Longer Work 59:00 The Cycle of Human Nature

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

new hivemind with @kaledora got her to pitch us on why the perpification of rwa’s will beat out tokenization of rwa’s

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

How does the Zora flywheel work? The term "flywheel" is overused in crypto, but Zora's tokenomics model is worth a closer look. Zora is engineered around a simple 3% fee on every trade: 1% to the creator, 1% to Zora, and 1% to the Liquidity Positions (LP). Every asset on the platform is directly or indirectly paired with the $ZORA token. Content coins are paired with creator coins, and creator coins are paired with $ZORA. This gives ZORA two distinct value accrual forces: fees and sinks. As the ultimate base pair, half of the fee to LP (0.5% of every trade) is effectively a buyback of $ZORA to be added to the liquidity pool. Since Zora and creator rewards are distributed in ZORA, all fees flow through and impact ZORA in one way or another. 2.5% of each trade results in immediate ZORA buy pressure. To understand why this design is so robust, we can look at Virtuals which inspired this model. Virtuals also had a powerful flywheel, but it was dependent on the initial launch and "graduation" of new agents from its bonding curve. Once major agent tokens matured, liquidity became fragmented and moved to more capital-efficient pools on Uniswap v3 or against other assets like USDC. This weakened the token sink aspect of the flywheel. Zora learns from this by routing trading volume through its official, canonical pools, preventing the liquidity fragmentation that Virtuals experienced. The result is a persistent token sink for $ZORA over the entire lifecycle of a creator's coin, ensuring that ongoing volume fuels the flywheel. Some may argue that a 3% swap fee is too high to sustain volume. However, there is precedent for this. During its peak, the NFT market thrived with $5B monthly volume despite ~10% fees. The Solana trenches all-in fees approach 3%: - Tokens graduate into 1% fee pools - The refined consumer-app interfaces (Phantom/Photon/Axiom) charge a 1% fee - Poor liquidity conditions, MEV, and socialized losses from snipers likely amount to 1%+ At its bear case, Zora is just a repackaging of the trenches with better tokenomics, distribution and branding. Zora brings hidden costs to the forefront and retains the value within the ecosystem. Trading volume of Zora coins will be the key metric to watch as the flywheel gets going.

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69