Sallar vs Destra Network: DePIN models at different market stages Same DePIN thesis. Very different valuations. @DestraNetwork (Ethereum | $DSYNC) → decentralized cloud stack (GPU, IPFS, DNS) → Market Cap: ~$15M @sallar_io (Solana | $ALL) → mobile & PC edge compute for AI workloads → Market Cap: ~$1M While @rendernetwork $RENDER and @nosana_ai $NOS price in mature GPU demand, and @helium $HNT or @grass $GRASS scale networking & data, Sallar represents early-stage consumer compute on @solana | $SOL. Different layers. Different chains. Different market expectations. #DePIN #Solana #Ethereum #Compute

Name & Symbol: Grass ($GRASS)
Address: Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs

DePIN on Solana: market cap trajectories into 2026 Looking at compute-focused DePINs, we see very different growth profiles: Sallar $ALL: mobile-first distributed compute → asymmetric upside from a low base Nosana $NOS: decentralized GPU workloads, closer to traditional cloud substitution Grass $GRASS: data + web crawling as AI infrastructure Render $RENDER: established GPU rendering with institutional adoption The pattern is clear: larger caps = slower multiples, earlier-stage networks = higher risk, higher potential. Across @sallar_io, @rendernetwork, @nosana_ai, @grass and even wireless models like @helium, Solana continues to be the settlement layer for DePIN economies. Not about hype — about where real-world usage meets tokenized infrastructure. @solana $SOL #DePIN #Solana #Web3Infrastructure

Name & Symbol: Grass ($GRASS)
Address: Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs