Logo

guess who pulled the rug from under you?

f1go.eth Details

Times Rugged:
0
% Rugged:
0%
Times Pumped:
0
% Pumped:
0%

$500T in real world assets. Less than 0.1% is tokenized today. You are so early it’s almost embarrassing.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-03-18 17:23:25 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00205
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00205
Price Change Ratio:
0.08%

Tempo, Arc and most other "L1s" are essentially just glorified AWS databases with no additional security guarantees whatsoever vs. corps like JPMorgan, Bank of America etc. If we're honest they're even worse because much less mature. CROPS or die.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2026-03-14 16:01:28 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.04596
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.04572
Price Change Ratio:
-0.51%

Tempo, Arc and moat other "L1s" are essentially just glorified AWS databases with no additional security guarantees whatsoever vs. corps like JPMorgan, Bank of America etc. If we're honest they're even worse because much less mature. CROPS or die.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2026-03-14 15:52:55 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.04593
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.04554
Price Change Ratio:
-0.85%

Running tradfi on corp chains give some efficiency gains but don't realize >90% of potential: - corp chains rival each other, there won't be a leading winner with deep liquidity, interoperability, permissionless access etc. - corp chains provide only security like a traditional company and would always have lock-in effects (likely artifically engineered because shareholder value) - Tempo won't outsource core business to Arc, Canton etc. because C suite would immediately fired (rightly so). Also competitors to Stripe won't run on Tempo (because Stripe is strategic partner. - Tempo, Arc, Canton etc. won't have interest in innovations disruption their business are that of their startegic partners. Therefore hindering innovation - likely more reasons permissionless L1s - namely ETH - are the future

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2026-03-12 17:46:20 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.04376
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.04369
Price Change Ratio:
-0.16%

From private payments to tokenized funds and AI standards, Ethereum builders kept shipping. Here are 25 things the ecosystem delivered this month. 0/ @payy_link announced Payy Network, a privacy-first Ethereum enabled EVM L2. It features default private token transfers and a cheaper way to build privacy-preserving applications, strengthening Ethereum’s privacy ecosystem. 1/ @RobinhoodApp launched the public testnet for Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2 powered by @arbitrum. Institutional settlement on Ethereum rollups continues to bridge traditional finance and public infrastructure. 2/ The @ethereumfndn Protocol Cluster published its 2026 priorities: Scale, Improve UX, and Harden the L1. Ethereum continues coordinating long-term technical upgrades in public to help steward the protocol forward. 3/ @l2beat launched L2BEAT Interop, a dashboard tracking cross-chain connectivity,value, and highlighting interoperability risks, helping the ecosystem stay connected to interoperability progress. 4/ @drakefjustin introduced Strawmap, a roadmap of proposed L1 protocol upgrades. It acts as a technical resource for researchers, developers, and participants in Ethereum governance. 5/ @Starknet integrated Nightfall, bringing confidential institutional DeFi to the Starknet stack. ZK privacy continues advancing Ethereum’s institutional use cases. 6/ @hinkal_protocol enabled private ETH and stablecoin payments on @arbitrum, demonstrating how private transactions are expanding across Ethereum L2s. 7/ @StartaleGroup introduced JPYSC, the first trust bank–backed JPY stablecoin. 8/ The One Trillion Dollar Security Dashboard was released by the @ethereumfndn. It is a comprehensive view of Ethereum’s security across the ecosystem. 9/ @builders_garden introduced Sign In With Agent (SIWA), a trustless identity standard for AI agents. 10/ @blockscout launched a Tor-native onion service: a privacy-first way to observe and verify Ethereum state. Blockscout’s .onion domain for Ethereum provides a way to view blocks, transactions and accounts. 11/ @MetaLeX_Labs launched cyberSign, letting users sign any legal agreement with @ethereum / @base. 12/ @Rocket_Pool activated Saturn One, introducing 4 ETH megapool validators. Improved capital efficiency strengthens Ethereum’s decentralized staking layer. 13/ @BNPParibas launched a euro-denominated money market fund on Ethereum. Tokenized funds on public blockchain infrastructure signal growing institutional confidence in Ethereum. 14/ Tokenized RWAs on Ethereum mainnet surpassed $15B in market cap. 15/ @aave crossed $1 trillion in all-time loans. 16/ @OndoFinance tokenized stocks (SPYon, QQQon) went live as DeFi collateral on @Morpho. Tokenized equities are now usable inside onchain credit markets. 17/ @eulerfinance enabled tokenized equities as collateral, built with @OndoFinance, @SentoraHQ, and @chainlink. Traditional financial exposure is now composable inside Ethereum-native lending markets. 18/ @Uniswap integrated with @Securitize to make @BlackRock’s BUIDL fund tradable via UniswapX. 19/ @LineaBuild sustained 100+ mGas/s throughput, peaking at 218 mGas/s, showing how rollups are scaling Ethereum in practice. 20/ @Starknet released Starkzap, an open-source SDK that turns apps into onchain consumer apps. 21/ @base announced @YCombinator startups can now get funded in USDC on Base. 22/ @Optimism shipped Upgrade 18 setting the foundation for a more performant, customizable, and operationally efficient OP Stack. 23/ @ether_fi released its iOS app. Native mobile access lowers the barrier to staking and DeFi participation. 24/ The next Ethereum Community Hub is launching in Rome, hosted by @urbeEth. Local builder ecosystems continue expanding globally.

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

Tweet Date:
2026-03-05 19:46:50 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.94400
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.95495
Price Change Ratio:
0.56%

From private payments to tokenized funds and AI standards, Ethereum builders kept shipping. Here are 25 things the ecosystem delivered this month. 0/ @payy_link announced Payy Network, a privacy-first Ethereum enabled EVM L2. It features default private token transfers and a cheaper way to build privacy-preserving applications, strengthening Ethereum’s privacy ecosystem. 1/ @RobinhoodApp launched the public testnet for Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2 powered by @arbitrum. Institutional settlement on Ethereum rollups continues to bridge traditional finance and public infrastructure. 2/ The @ethereumfndn Protocol Cluster published its 2026 priorities: Scale, Improve UX, and Harden the L1. Ethereum continues coordinating long-term technical upgrades in public to help steward the protocol forward. 3/ @l2beat launched L2BEAT Interop, a dashboard tracking cross-chain connectivity,value, and highlighting interoperability risks, helping the ecosystem stay connected to interoperability progress. 4/ @drakefjustin introduced Strawmap, a roadmap of proposed L1 protocol upgrades. It acts as a technical resource for researchers, developers, and participants in Ethereum governance. 5/ @Starknet integrated Nightfall, bringing confidential institutional DeFi to the Starknet stack. ZK privacy continues advancing Ethereum’s institutional use cases. 6/ @hinkal_protocol enabled private ETH and stablecoin payments on @arbitrum, demonstrating how private transactions are expanding across Ethereum L2s. 7/ @StartaleGroup introduced JPYSC, the first trust bank–backed JPY stablecoin. 8/ The One Trillion Dollar Security Dashboard was released by the @ethereumfndn. It is a comprehensive view of Ethereum’s security across the ecosystem. 9/ @builders_garden introduced Sign In With Agent (SIWA), a trustless identity standard for AI agents. 10/ @blockscout launched a Tor-native onion service: a privacy-first way to observe and verify Ethereum state. Blockscout’s .onion domain for Ethereum provides a way to view blocks, transactions and accounts. 11/ @MetaLeX_Labs launched cyberSign, letting users sign any legal agreement with @ethereum / @base. 12/ @Rocket_Pool activated Saturn One, introducing 4 ETH megapool validators. Improved capital efficiency strengthens Ethereum’s decentralized staking layer. 13/ @BNPParibas launched a euro-denominated money market fund on Ethereum. Tokenized funds on public blockchain infrastructure signal growing institutional confidence in Ethereum. 14/ Tokenized RWAs on Ethereum mainnet surpassed $15B in market cap. 15/ @aave crossed $1 trillion in all-time loans. 16/ @OndoFinance tokenized stocks (SPYon, QQQon) went live as DeFi collateral on @Morpho. Tokenized equities are now usable inside onchain credit markets. 17/ @eulerfinance enabled tokenized equities as collateral, built with @OndoFinance, @SentoraHQ, and @chainlink. Traditional financial exposure is now composable inside Ethereum-native lending markets. 18/ @Uniswap integrated with @Securitize to make @BlackRock’s BUIDL fund tradable via UniswapX. 19/ @LineaBuild sustained 100+ mGas/s throughput, peaking at 218 mGas/s, showing how rollups are scaling Ethereum in practice. 20/ @Starknet released Starkzap, an open-source SDK that turns apps into onchain consumer apps. 21/ @base announced @YCombinator startups can now get funded in USDC on Base. 22/ @Optimism shipped Upgrade 18 setting the foundation for a more performant, customizable, and operationally efficient OP Stack. 23/ @ether_fi released its iOS app. Native mobile access lowers the barrier to staking and DeFi participation. 24/ The next Ethereum Community Hub is launching in Rome, hosted by @urbeEth. Local builder ecosystems continue expanding globally.

Name & Symbol: Euler Finance ($EUL)
Address: 0xd9fcd98c322942075a5c3860693e9f4f03aae07b

Tweet Date:
2026-03-05 19:46:50 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.09816
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.09208
Price Change Ratio:
-0.55%

🔥 UPDATE: RWA growth on Ethereum exceeded the combined total of the next five chains in 2025. https://t.co/l4QfeCeD1N

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-02-25 22:15:47 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00197
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00197
Price Change Ratio:
0.05%

Total adressable market for RWA tokenization is still another 1000x. Everybody who says we're in late stages severly lacks imagination / ignores the numbers. ETH best positioned to be foundation for tokenization with it's state level secure L1 and already being prime venue for stablecoins, Defi & RWAs.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-02-21 17:10:06 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00194
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00195
Price Change Ratio:
0.55%

Getting reports of users receiving emails for their "allocation being ready" from the public sale. These are phishing attempts and should not be trusted. Allocations will be not be covered until TGE KPIs are hit, which can be tracked on our website: [TOKEN] https://t.co/k1USypwfcM

Name & Symbol: TokenFi ($TOKEN)
Address: 0x4507cef57c46789ef8d1a19ea45f4216bae2b528

Tweet Date:
2026-02-15 19:03:30 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00329
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00330
Price Change Ratio:
0.06%

How I would do creator coins We've seen about 10 years of people trying to do content incentivization in crypto, from early-stage platforms like Bihu and Steemit, to BitClout in 2021, to Zora, to tipping features inside of decentralized social, and more. So far, I think we have not been very successful, and I think this is because the problem is fundamentally hard. First, my view of what the problem is. A major difference between doing "creator incentives" in the 00s vs doing them today, is that in the 00s, a primary problem was having not enough content at all. In the 20s, there's plenty of content, AI can generate an entire metaverse full of it for like $10. The problem is quality. And so your goal is not *incentivizing content*, it's *surfacing good content*. Personally, I think that the most successful example of creator incentives we've seen is Substack. To see why, take a look at the top 10: https://t.co/duaCaGNYXp https://t.co/y1F9Td0Y52 https://t.co/xEMt8pIK74 Now, you may disagree with many of these authors. But I have no doubt that: 1. They are on the whole high quality, and contribute positively to the discussion 2. They are mostly people who would not have been elevated without Substack's presence So Substack is genuinely surfacing high quality and pluralism. Now, we can compare to creator coin projects. I don't want to pick on a single one, because I think there's a failure mode of the entire category. For example: Top Zora creator coins: https://t.co/238cqf2bX1 BitClout: https://t.co/0jVmotkpFw Basically, the top 10 are people who already have very high social status, and who are often impressive but primarily for reasons other than the content they create. At the core, Substack is a simple subscription service: you pay $N per month, and you get to see the person's articles. But a big part of Substack's success is that they did not just set the mechanism and forget. Their launch process was very hands-on, deliberately seeding the platform with high-quality creators, based on a very particular vision of what kind of high-quality intellectual environment they wanted to foster, including giving selected people revenue guarantees. So now, let's get to one idea that I think could work (of course, coming up with new ideas is inherently a more speculative project than criticizing existing ones, and more prone to error). Create a DAO, that is *not* token-based. Instead, the inspiration should be Protocol Guild: there are N members, and they can (anonymously) vote new members in and out. If N gets above ~200, consider auto-splitting it. Importantly, do _not_ try to make the DAO universal or even industry-wide. Instead, embrace the opinionatedness. Be okay with having a dominant type of content (long-form writing, music, short-form video, long-form video, fiction, educational...), and be okay with having a dominant style (eg. country or region of origin, political viewpoint, if within crypto which projects you're most friendly to...). Hand-pick the initial membership set, in order to maximize its alignment with the desired style. The goal is to have a group that is larger than one creator and can accumulate a public brand and collectively bargain to seek revenue opportunities, but at the same time small enough that internal governance is tractable. Now, here is where the tokens come in. In general, one of my hypotheses this decade is that a large portion of effective governance mechanisms will all have the form factor of "large number of people and bots participating in a prediction market, with the output oracle being a diverse set of people optimized for mission alignment and capture resistance". In this case, what we do is: anyone can become a creator and create a creator coin, and then, if they get admitted to a creator DAO, a portion of their proceeds from the DAO are used to burn their creator coins. This way, the token speculators are NOT participating in a recursive-speculation attention game backed only by itself. Instead, they are specifically being predictors of what new creators the high-value creator DAOs will be willing to accept. At the same time, they also provide a valuable service to the creator DAOs: they are helping surface promising creators for the DAOs to choose from. So the ultimate decider of who rises and falls is not speculators, but high-value content creators (we make the assumption that good creators are also good judges of quality, which seems often true). Individual speculators can stay in the game and thrive to the extent that they do a good job of predicting the creator DAOs' actions.

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Tweet Date:
2026-02-01 22:21:12 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02689
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02589
Price Change Ratio:
-3.72%

🦞Agentic DeFi is Here 🦞 We have deployed: → Custom UniswapV3 TWAP Oracle Factory (permissionless, any token) →CLAWNCH/USDC Morpho market Agents can now borrow USDC against their tokens to fund development without selling a single token. This is how autonomous agents stay capitalized: 1. Launch token via Clawnch 2. Earn trading fees 3. Deposit tokens as collateral 4. Borrow USDC for compute, infra, whatever 5. Repay from fee revenue No VCs. No dumps. Just sustainable agent economics. The oracle factory is public infra—any token with a V3 pool can spin up a Morpho market in one easy command from https://t.co/NtrA2TTnzv docs. Agents funding agents. 🦞 Test pool: https://t.co/PDteiM7UbJ

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

Tweet Date:
2026-02-01 08:39:37 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.13202
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.13037
Price Change Ratio:
-0.15%

Over 80% of Ondo's tokenized treasuries and stocks are on Ethereum (source: @RWA_xyz). Ethereum is for tokenization.

Name & Symbol: Ondo ($ONDO)
Address: 0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3

Tweet Date:
2026-01-23 20:18:07 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.34951
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.34915
Price Change Ratio:
-0.1%

Friendly reminder that ETH is > 10x ahead of every other decentralized public chain re: RWA TVL with $11,24B being tokenized. Zero counterparty risk & state level security matter. https://t.co/NHUQFnkv0F

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-01-18 09:24:39 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00323
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00324
Price Change Ratio:
0.19%

If you are into RWA, please do check this out. The framework addresses major DX issues of ERC-3643, providing diamond architecture, modules, and hooks. Also supports ERC-721. Just a great piece of Solidity code. https://t.co/gh3EyttotG

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-01-11 09:36:04 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00322
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00320
Price Change Ratio:
-0.46%

Super fun watching @noah_pravecek build out the L1 interop capabilities for ZKsync. Every RWA on L1 can be directly accessed from a Prividium, or any ZKsync Chain. No longer need to get asset issuers to deploy on an L2. Just deploy on Ethereum L1 and it’s accessible directly from the chain. This is real L2<>L1 synergy

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2026-01-11 09:27:13 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00321
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00320
Price Change Ratio:
-0.27%

I'm probably the only (or one of the very few) crypto guys who warned you about the dangers of indirect tokenization. Everyone else too busy celebrating the slightest arguable RWA wins even though most of the 'tokenized stocks' are illusory contracts backed by opaque offshore SPVs. Turns out these types of 'SPV' structures are generally illegal because violating issuer transfer restrictions, and other times are outright scams because they don't really hold the claimed shares at all or aren't actually giving you any rights to them. Tokenization has to be done the right way--direct, un-intermediated by the issuer, or if intermediated at least still with the issuer's consent & participation. I have been beating this drum since 2018 (https://t.co/dUWJiqrhxR) and my vision will win in the end, it's the only way that tokenization makes real sense. Mere economic exposure is not enough.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-12-21 08:37:21 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00289
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00288
Price Change Ratio:
-0.15%

AI Projects by Fee/Revenue (2025 Estimates) These are the protocols actually generating cash: #VIRTUAL : ~$75M $TAO : ~$50M $RENDER : ~$40M $FET (ASI) : ~$35M $NEAR : ~$30M $ICP : ~$25M $GRT : ~$20M $FIL : ~$18M $AKT : ~$15M $IP : ~$12M #VIRTUAL leading the pack with $75M in estimated 2025 revenue, 50% more than $TAO in second place. Which AI project do you think will surprise everyone with revenue growth in 2026?

Name & Symbol: Virtuals Protocol ($VIRTUAL)
Address: 0x0b3e328455c4059eeb9e3f84b5543f74e24e7e1b

Tweet Date:
2025-12-20 07:51:52 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.72640
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.73213
Price Change Ratio:
0.79%

Even I had not realized yet that liquidity on Ethereum for @OndoFinance RWA has improved dramatically. You can buy 100k worth of a range of stocks essentially without any slippage on CoW - and if you need more, simply TWAP. https://t.co/9kYX4h5c2r

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-12-11 19:41:27 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00320
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00319
Price Change Ratio:
-0.21%

“We predict an acceleration of institutional DeFi and RWA tokenization, driven by the Digital Asset Basic Act. This legal clarity will de-risk the ecosystem and attract capital from institutions that prefer Ethereum’s high security and established liquidity.” — @lepsoe https://t.co/DutahvrvDY

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-12-11 07:25:54 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00316
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00317
Price Change Ratio:
0.03%

Recently, there has been drama in Solana DeFi land as Kamino has blocked users from using Jupiter Lend. 😬 Here's why @tayvano_ says Kamino is making a mistake 😕 https://t.co/FmPLnvZrqr

Name & Symbol: Kamino ($KMNO)
Address: KMNo3nJsBXfcpJTVhZcXLW7RmTwTt4GVFE7suUBo9sS

Tweet Date:
2025-12-06 09:10:34 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.06163
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.06170
Price Change Ratio:
0.11%

Doing purely stablecoin txns within some of the global spheres of influence (US, China, Russia etc.) could potentially happen mainly on the respective private networks / corp chains (Tempo, Arc etc.). But would have very limited usecases: → want to use Defi? ETH is the prime venue to do so with infinitely deep liquidity, most possibilities and always being at the cutting edge of innovation due to it's open-source ethos. → want to just store your stablecoins while earning a decent yield? ETH will always have the highest security and highest yield (deep liquidity, most possibilities, no counterparty-risk etc.) to do so. That's even more important for companies / institutions than for end users. → want to interact with other corp chains or services from companies don't having an own corp chain? It's not in the interest for corp chains to move their users to other corp chains, so there will be some kind of "natural" barriers. Also smaller companies won't outsource their core business to the major ones since then only a matter of time until corp chains will extract value from them or simply rebuild their business. Businesses want in general having no counterparty-risk. Best place to have this guarantee is ETH. → if living in a relatively safe western country you can be relatively sure that your government won't do funny stuff with your onchain bags. Very different when living in places with way less freedom. Governments will always have some influence over their citizens. But people will have more freedom when using ETH than using corp chains. → want to bridge to any other L2s? ETH will have the least friction to interact with any kind of usecases in finance, gaming, social, art etc. And while doing so the user will have ETH L1 security guarantees. → when companies & govs will do their onchain business they won't use corp chains. They simply do not provide enough security and are not suitable for e.g. US & China doing business. Surely more to write (and in a more elaborate way ;) but tldr; is: ETH is a global platform providing the foundation for onchain AI economy. It provides state level security without counterparty risk and is literally infinitely scalable with it's L2 model. It will always have the most thriving Defi ecosystem due to it's properties and all it's dapps can interact with everything else with least friction. Corp chains are something completely different. They lack ETH security, have counter-party risks, will have way more friction (not native to ETH Defi), less variety re: dapps and are in essence: just companies. They will heavily compete with each other for profits, users etc. Same system like we have now but with different tech underneath. So think corp chains have their benefits for forseeable future in onoarding mainstream to crypto. Don't really think majority of stablecoin txns will happen on them because ETH will have huge pull and be more convenient. ETH and corp chains not comparable and I personally see them as no threat to ETH. ETH will keep on moving ahead with lightspeed and bring the most benefit to any kind of users (retail, corps & govs).

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2025-11-26 06:30:54 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.03057
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.03041
Price Change Ratio:
-0.51%

Doing purely stablecoin txns within some of the global spheres of influence (US, China, Russia etc.) could happen mainly on the respective private networks / corp chains (Tempo, Arc etc.). But has very limited usecases: → want to use Defi? ETH is the prime venue to do so with infinitely deep liquidity, most possibilities and always being at the cutting edge of innovation due to it's open-source ethos. → want to just store your stablecoins while earning a decent yield? ETH will always have the highest security and highest yield (deep liquidity, most possibilities, no counterparty-risk etc.) to do so. That's even more important for companies / institutions than for end users. → want to interact with other corp chains or services from companies don't having an own corp chain? It's not in the interest for corp chains to move their users to other corp chains, so there will be some kind of "natural" barriers. Also smaller companies won't outsource their core business to the major ones since then only a matter of time until corp chains will extract value from them or simply rebuild their business. Businesses want in general having no counterparty-risk. Best place to have this guarantee is ETH. → if living in a relatively safe western country you can be relatively sure that your government won't do funny stuff with your onchain bags. Very different when living in places with way less freedom. Governments will always have some influence over their citizens. But people will have more freedom when using ETH than using corp chains. → want to bridge to any other L2s? ETH will have the least friction to interact with any kind of usecases in finance, gaming, social, art etc. And while doing so the user will have ETH L1 security guarantees. → when companies & govs will do their onchain business they won't use corp chains. They simply do not provide enough security and are not suitable for e.g. US & China doing business. Surely more to write (and in a more elaborate way ;) but tldr; is: ETH is a global platform providing the foundation for onchain AI economy. It provides state level security without counterparty risk and is literally infinitely scalable with it's L2 model. It will always have the most thriving Defi ecosystem due to it's properties and all it's dapps can interact with everything else with least friction. Corp chains are something completely different. They lack ETH security, have counter-party risks, will have way more friction (not native to ETH Defi), less variety re: dapps and are in essence: just companies. So think corp chains have their benefits for forseeable future in onoarding mainstream to crypto. But ETH and corp chains not comparable and I personally see them as no threat to ETH. ETH will keep on moving ahead with lightspeed and bring the most benefit to any kind of users (retail, corps & govs).

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2025-11-26 05:58:40 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02975
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02968
Price Change Ratio:
-0.25%

Personally think we have a big issue with semantics. Is a few months pullback within a bull market already a bear market? Still personally think we will be fine in 2026 / next few monts. Just because (likely) a MM has gone bust / exchange has to compensate him by selling some big clips of majors shouldn't start a bear market. Can be wrong obviously, just my 2 cents.

Name & Symbol: MOMOFUN ($MM)
Address: 0xa5346f91a767b89a0363a4309c8e6c5adc0c4a59

Tweet Date:
2025-11-24 08:25:42 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00018
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00017
Price Change Ratio:
-4.16%

Using historical numbers, this is how $UNI would stack up against current buyback tokens. → 0.3% LP fee becomes 0.25% (LP)/0.05% (UNI) → 0.05% over ~$2.8B annualized fees and you get ~$38m in buybacks every 30d Would put it ahead of $PUMP ($35M) and behind $HYPE ($95M) https://t.co/2KR0abGKm2

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

Tweet Date:
2025-11-11 18:25:20 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00443
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00438
Price Change Ratio:
-1.25%

Defi App's Million Dollar Trading Competition starts this week. To join, just trade perps on a Defi App Embedded Wallet. EOA activity will not count on the leaderboard. If you’re an EOA user who is competing, create a new Defi App account using SSO or Email. Details below. https://t.co/d6RNLzauwI

Name & Symbol: Defi App ($HOME)
Address: 0x4bfaa776991e85e5f8b1255461cbbd216cfc714f

Tweet Date:
2025-11-03 14:41:51 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02173
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02128
Price Change Ratio:
-2.08%

If you're curious why $1.5 billion in tokenized t-bills moved from Ethereum L1 to Apotos, Avalanche, Polygon last week look at incentives. BUIDL fees dropped from 50 bps to 20 bps for those chains (and Solana) vs Ethereum - that's $4.5m in annualized savings on $1.5 billion. I don't have insider baseball on this but it's likely BlackRock didn't cut fees because Larry's feeling generous. A simple theory: Aptos, Polygon, Solana, Avalanche are paying BlackRock incentives for this privilege - or else, why only those chains at 20 bps while Optimism and Arbitrum are 50 bps? If you're Avalanche with rich AVAX treasury would you pay a couple million to BlackRock in exchange for #2 on the RWA t-bill charts? Wouldn't be the worst marketing dollars you've spent. And once again we see goodhart's law in crypto - when a measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure. RWAs without deep liquidity and DeFi ties to the underlying network are vanity metrics - they don't really need the underlying chain, there's minimal moat. If the theory is right a few lessons: - Untethered RWAs are vanity metrics - Chains are spending for these metrics - "Spending" is token sell pressure There's good BD spend and there's bad BD spend. I'm not sure this is good spend.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-11-01 09:00:40 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00471
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00471
Price Change Ratio:
0.01%

Just put in my bid on the @megaeth_labs ICO on Echo/Sonic/Coinbase whatever we're calling it now = ) Was a bit rocky to get all my KYC and accreditation sorted and not sure I could've done it without @hotpot_dao and @NamikMuduroglu personally helping me out which I really appreciate But let's just take a moment to appreciate that things like @echodotxyz and @legiondotcc exist now and based teams like @megaeth_labs are actually reducing ownership by VCs to let in the public. I remember in spring of 2023 when I was still @delphi_labs telling them about MiCA and saying "this will unleash ICOs again"; that led to the incubation of Legion at the same time as @cobie was forming echo, I even tried to bring them together early on but alas it was not meant to be. But the bigger point is that the market, while still very flawed, has made huge improvements in the last two years and this is something to really pause and be grateful for, despite all the bullshit we still see in crypto, it *is* getting better little by little. Strongly encourage others to participate in this moment--think about it, years ago you would've killed to have the opportunities that now are available daily, and you would've been bitching about VC cabals etc. Now we are the cabal. https://t.co/e6JVhVpIvY

Name & Symbol: Echo Protocol ($ECHO)
Address: 0x06238c1b8e618abedf17669228dc95fb2d2e210b

Tweet Date:
2025-10-28 07:48:52 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02921
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02954
Price Change Ratio:
1.13%

Earlier this week Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller issued a historic proposal for crypto. Give non-banks (like crypto exchanges) access to FedWire. Give them a "skinny master account" at the Fed. Why is this a big deal for crypto? Because now we can completely bypass the banks. Say you're a young, savvy - decent income. You invest, you save. You move money to Coinbase and Robinhood for crypto and stocks. The only reason you need a WellsFargo account is paychecks and to pay bills. But what if your employer's payroll software could direct deposit to Coinbase? You collect 3.75% on your cash, better interface, access to every asset on the planet. And what if you could pay all your bills from your stablecoin account in Coinbase? You'd drop WellsFargo like airport sushi. Sure, maybe you'd use the old banks for mortgages and loans - but everything else on Coinbase. Bye bye bank. Hello DeFi So the crypto exchanges become crypto banks? Yes, but no. All the frontier exchanges - coinbase and robinhood - the crypto banks as I used to call them - these become more onchain every year. Because DeFi is better finance. Every time Coinbase wallet adds a DeFi protocol - a loan on Morpho or a trade on Uniswap and Aerodrome your assets become more bankless. Exchanges are the gateway drug to DeFi and they become a bridge from FedWire to Ethereum and DeFi. Ethereum gets a skinny account at FedWire. You become more bankless. The banks will fight this, but crypto wins.

Name & Symbol: Aerodrome ($AERO)
Address: 0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631

Tweet Date:
2025-10-25 19:33:20 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.93751
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.92326
Price Change Ratio:
-1.52%

megaeth just dropped another banger: - $MEGA to become store of value for the foundation (buybacks confirmed) - public sale starts at $1M valuation, capped at $999M - likely to hit the top valuation = 5% of tokens for sale = $50M raise - NO second fluffle sale - but those who were supposed to mint will get priority - $186,282 max per user, min 5,000 users with same price allocation as fluffle 1 (2650 USDT) - post-TGE reward campaign coming for all echo / fluffle / sonar participants using megaeth dApps have extreme fomo right now.

Name & Symbol: Echo Protocol ($ECHO)
Address: 0x06238c1b8e618abedf17669228dc95fb2d2e210b

Tweet Date:
2025-10-22 18:22:20 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02663
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02709
Price Change Ratio:
1.71%

Making an educated guess based on public info 1. A fund blew up earlier this year and closed. They are now a forced seller 2. Terms of the MegaETH SAFT do not allow secondary sale unless explicitly approved by the team. This means the fund is forced seller and has very limited options here 3. The team decides to take advantage of it and squeezes out the fund, buying them back at a valuation which is probably close to their last round. While terms should be below where they would have been able to sell to another VC, fund investors can live with it as its above valuation it entered: they were pre-seed 4. The team decides to re-allocate those tokens to the public (see reasons below) instead of selling them to another VC. 5. Those tokens are sold to the public liquid which means their value should also be higher than the PV vs. when the fund was owning them (coming with with a multi-year lock). 6. Additionally, the MegaETH team decides not to optimise for $ in the sale here. MegaETH does have a clear track record of being community-focused and giving retail similar to better terms than what they could have gotten in private markets, see their large echo sale, fluffle sale, etc. (yes, a handful of projects actually care) 6. Because the terms of the buyback were bad for seller and the ICO approach makes sense, the investors that have veto rights under the SAFT decided to waive them and allow for the reallocation Obviously I may be wrong but this seems based on very reasonable assumptions. Disclosure: Googly Capital participated in the MegaETH Echo round + holds a few fluffles. As that exposure is immaterial, Googly Capital is currently planning to participate in the MegaETH ICO (assuming the valuation makes sense) to get more exposure to a project it genuinely likes and believes has potential.

Name & Symbol: Echo Protocol ($ECHO)
Address: 0x06238c1b8e618abedf17669228dc95fb2d2e210b

Tweet Date:
2025-10-18 17:19:34 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02176
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02176
Price Change Ratio:
-0%

Introducing Believe Fund Zora's mission is to build the new creator economy. Believe Fund will accelerate this by supporting the most promising next generation of creators with 20M $ZORA to start. Over the coming months, Believe Fund will begin deploying capital and deepening liquidity for creator coins within Zora’s growing economy. The thesis is simple: Believe in someone.

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Tweet Date:
2025-10-15 19:05:36 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.09622
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.09282
Price Change Ratio:
-3.54%

The next era of crypto is arriving on Defi App. Imagine opening your phone, going 1000x long, closing in profit, then instantly parking your winnings in a 10% yield position. All self-custody, no network switching, no stress. Here’s what’s next for Defi App this year: https://t.co/PKY8IjlZif

Name & Symbol: Defi App ($HOME)
Address: 0x4bfaa776991e85e5f8b1255461cbbd216cfc714f

Tweet Date:
2025-10-15 17:57:40 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02979
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.03150
Price Change Ratio:
5.75%

monad airdrop eligibility list: - monad community - monad cards (even if you didn't claim) - traders on hyperliquid, phantom, traders of tokens launched on pumpfun, virtuals, and other memecoins. - depositors into defi protocols including aave, euler, morpho, pendle, lighter, curve, pancakeswap, and uniswap. - longtime owners of various NFTs, including azuki, chimpers, cryptopunks, doodles, fluffle, hypurr, mad lads, meebits, miladies, moonbirds, pudgy penguins, redacted remilio babies, sappy seals, solana monkey business (gen 2), and wassies - recently active participants of governance in DAOs of eth defi protocols - select members of [ ] - participants in the legion fundraising platform, - backpack users - fantasy top heroes - metadao token holders - arc community - active participants in the LobsterDAO tg - notable farcaster users - zachXBT - members of SEAL 911 - select Cantina auditors with a history of impactful findings - members of the protocol guild (as determined by inspecting the Splits contract) - students and instructors from educational efforts including rareskills and shefi - members of teams that are building natively on monad - developers who made qualified submissions in monad blitzes, dev missions, and other hackathons - individuals who have made notable contributions as builders on monad - many, many more. even if you think you aren't eligible, it is worth checking. there was so much demand that we broke privy which disabled apps across all of crypto. fake news is running wild. it is a chaotic day. my only question for you: are you not entertained?

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

Tweet Date:
2025-10-14 21:31:13 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.92459
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.94117
Price Change Ratio:
0.86%

monad airdrop eligibility list: - monad community - monad cards (even if you didn't claim) - traders on hyperliquid, phantom, traders of tokens launched on pumpfun, virtuals, and other memecoins. - depositors into defi protocols including aave, euler, morpho, pendle, lighter, curve, pancakeswap, and uniswap. - longtime owners of various NFTs, including azuki, chimpers, cryptopunks, doodles, fluffle, hypurr, mad lads, meebits, miladies, moonbirds, pudgy penguins, redacted remilio babies, sappy seals, solana monkey business (gen 2), and wassies - recently active participants of governance in DAOs of eth defi protocols - select members of [ ] - participants in the legion fundraising platform, - backpack users - fantasy top heroes - metadao token holders - arc community - active participants in the LobsterDAO tg - notable farcaster users - zachXBT - members of SEAL 911 - select Cantina auditors with a history of impactful findings - members of the protocol guild (as determined by inspecting the Splits contract) - students and instructors from educational efforts including rareskills and shefi - members of teams that are building natively on monad - developers who made qualified submissions in monad blitzes, dev missions, and other hackathons - individuals who have made notable contributions as builders on monad - many, many more. even if you think you aren't eligible, it is worth checking. there was so much demand that we broke privy which disabled apps across all of crypto. fake news is running wild. it is a chaotic day. my only question for you: are you not entertained?

Name & Symbol: Doodles ($DOOD)
Address: 0x722294f6c97102fb0ddb5b907c8d16bdeab3f6d9

Tweet Date:
2025-10-14 21:31:13 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00811
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00815
Price Change Ratio:
0.47%

My thoughts on yesterday’s crypto crash: TLDR: We’ll be fine. We always are. I’ve been in this industry for 9 years now, and I’d say I’ve really seen it all. The COVID crash, the $LUNA meltdown, the FTX collapse, you name it. But what we witnessed yesterday felt very different from most things I’ve experienced before. While many coins look completely wrecked on the charts, it didn’t feel as dramatic to me as some of the true black swan events we’ve seen in the past. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to downplay it. Yesterday was the largest liquidation event in crypto history, and my heart genuinely goes out to everyone - friends, colleagues, and beyond - who suffered massive losses that will take a long time to recover from. I wish this on no one. However, while we still don’t fully understand what happened, the big difference this time is that there doesn’t seem to be a fundamental reason for such an extreme crash. Sure, Trump’s tariff threats against China might have started the dump, but that alone surely doesn’t justify -99% crashes across major caps. It really feels like something went seriously wrong behind the scenes at Binance or a major market maker, triggering a one-of-a-kind liquidation cascade that wiped out liquidity across the board and sent some assets literally to zero. As much as I criticize Binance at times, they’ve always had the most robust trading infrastructure in the industry. So seeing price action like this even happen on their platform felt very strange, and even stranger was the fact that Binance literally stopped working for 10–20 minutes when I tried to buy those -90% dips. That suspicion grew even stronger when I switched to DEXs to buy. Prices there for assets like $PUMP or $JTO were around 25% higher than on Binance. Tokens like $CARDS, which aren’t listed on major exchanges, were affected significantly less. Normally, during fundamental market crashes, it’s exactly the other way around. Rumors are already flying, and I’m sure we’ll get more clarity in the next few days. But from what I can judge and from almost a decade of living and breathing this industry: my gut says this was a massive technical issue, not a fundamental one. And that, to me, is bullish. For context, the COVID crash and FTX collapse hit me hard. Back then, I genuinely thought it might be over. I remember feeling anxious for days, even weeks, questioning my entire future in this space. This time felt completely different. I bought immediately, and after reflecting for about 10 hours, I want to buy even more. I know many of you are going through a tough time right now, and I’m deeply sorry for your losses. Nobody could have predicted this and trust me, even the biggest OGs and professionals in this space got hit badly. But nothing fundamental has changed about this industry. The only question you should ask yourself right now is: “How much do I truly believe in crypto long term?” If you doubt that crypto as a whole can survive or thrive long term, I understand why you might be too afraid to buy right now. But in that case, you probably weren’t here for the right reasons to begin with. As for me, I have zero doubt. This industry isn’t just here to stay, it’s on track to 10x from here and beyond. It’s only a matter of time. So why would I panic over a technical glitch that caused prices to drop -99%? Of course, it’s painful, but rationally speaking, this might be one of the greatest opportunities you’ll ever get in your lifetime. Don’t bury your head in the sand, not after everything we’ve survived over the past years. Events like this separate the wheat from the chaff, the winners from the losers. If it’s even remotely possible for you right now, just survive. That’s all you need to do. I promise you, you won’t regret it.

Name & Symbol: Pump.fun ($PUMP)
Address: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn

Tweet Date:
2025-10-11 09:01:04 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00415
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00421
Price Change Ratio:
1.32%

Lighter is the missing link in Ethereum DeFi Eco Ethereum is the engine of innovation in the DeFi space, having developed the largest DeFi primitives that everyone knows about today. Other networks are simply copying these primitives. But Ethereum has one clear problem: it still lacks a good PerpDEX. Whoever solves this problem will become one of the largest players in the entire Web3 market. Lighter is the closest to achieving this. ___________ Many teams tried to build a PerpDEX on the Ethereum network, but it was an impossible task. The most advanced was @dYdX , which developed its solution based on StarkEx. They held a dominant position for several years, but eventually migrated to Cosmos. And interestingly, after this migration, the project lost the battle for leadership in the PerpDEX sector. Another major project was @synthetix_io , which faced a governance crisis and was unable to overcome technical difficulties. Both projects were quite expensively valued, but they failed to address the key issues related to Ethereum's scalability and slowness. The entire ecosystem recognized this problem, and so PerpDEXs began migrating to L2s. First, it was GMX, but later came Hyperliquid, Avantis, Apex, and others. The Web3 community accepted the fact that it was impossible to build a fast and convenient PerpDEX on Ethereum. ____________ It was at this point that @vnovakovski and his team came forward and said it was possible using custom zk-circuits and new DB view. Ultimately, they were able to build Lighter, which functions like zk L2 but has a completely different communication format with L1, allowing Lighter to be called a native PerpDEX for Ethereum. Why Is This Important? Ethereum has always been the birthplace of all DeFi primitives. And now it has the final DeFi primitive, which will transform Ethereum into a fully-fledged financial platform that will replace the global financial system. Lighter is the final missing link (and the most difficult one) for Ethereum DeFi to become fully functional. Thanks to @Lighter_xyz , capital will begin to return to Ethereum, as it opens up new opportunities for DeFi strategies and vaults that were previously impossible. If you compare Binance eco and Ethereum Eco, Lighter is the exchange itself and the trading engine around which an ecosystem can be built. The difference with Hyperliquid is that this entire ecosystem has already been built. Lighter just needs to integrate into it to become the largest PerpDEX in the world.

Name & Symbol: Avantis ($AVNT)
Address: 0x696f9436b67233384889472cd7cd58a6fb5df4f1

Tweet Date:
2025-10-09 19:00:57 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.81656
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.81742
Price Change Ratio:
0.1%

$ZORA is now available to trade on Robinhood. https://t.co/ggOw7i2vco

Name & Symbol: Zora ($ZORA)
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Tweet Date:
2025-10-09 17:02:34 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.07392
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.07675
Price Change Ratio:
3.83%

Aerodrome should be 7x more valuable than Solana according to Blockworks & concernoor logic. Unfortunately it makes zero sense.

Name & Symbol: Aerodrome ($AERO)
Address: 0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631

Tweet Date:
2025-10-09 13:20:05 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.07138
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.06854
Price Change Ratio:
-0.27%

Just bought back 150% of last week’s HOME emissions. The bigger the rewards, the bigger the buyback. TX hash below 👇 https://t.co/XBVfdwoYP7

Name & Symbol: Defi App ($HOME)
Address: 0x4bfaa776991e85e5f8b1255461cbbd216cfc714f

Tweet Date:
2025-10-07 13:14:29 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.03161
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.03084
Price Change Ratio:
-2.45%

Corp chains like Tempo or Arc are essentially the same like companies running blockchain tech on AWS with APIs to connect to real public blockchains like ETH. Will be pretty much clear next 1-2 years, glad we have Omid fighting the good fight .

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2025-10-06 17:27:59 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02253
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02184
Price Change Ratio:
-3.04%

Should @Plasma be an L2? AJ argues that Plasma should be an L2 in order to save on validator costs - $550m per year in savings. I think this is long-term correct however the market structure has to fundamentally change to make it long-term correct. The L1 Premium ROI Right now there's an L1 premium even for assets that aren't competing as a store of value. Should this be the case? I can't see why - not in the long-term. But the market currently disagrees. Let's look at FDV comps: Arbitrum (L2) - $4.3 billion Optimism (L2) - $2.9 billion ZKSync (L2) - $1.1 billion Compare these to EVM L1 chains that could be L2s: Tron (L1) - $32 billion Plasma (L1) - $9.6 billion There's clearly an L1 Premium. Say $5 billion of Plasma's current FDV is due to L1 premium. That's worth 10 years of $500m (5% of FDV) per year in validator costs. Add to this: Plasma can throttle issuance at any time - why not decrease validator rewards to 1-2% as the network grows? If you think you can be a deca-billion network it's market rational to launch an L1 instead of an L2 because of the L1 Premium. That's why Stripe's Tempo, Circle's Arc, Tether's Plasma are all launching as L1s instead of Ethereum L2s. The technical reasons they give are ex post facto rationalizations for the real reason: L1s are higher ROI because of the L1 Premium. Look at it from their perspective. Worst case - the L1 Premium evaporates in the years ahead. Fine, they just pivot to an L2 - they've lost nothing. Will the L1 Premium persist? Truthfully, i don't know. Maybe as the market matures we'll move from a Dumb L1 Premium to a Smart L1 Premium - only the assets truly competing as a nation-state grade censorship resistant store of value (SoV) will get the L1 premium and all other L1/L2 assets will be valued based on revenue and supply sinks. To me, BTC and ETH pass the SoV bar and it's very much TBD on everything else. But i'm not the market. The market says XRP is worth $300 billion and that the L1 Premium is real. So that's the takeaway for L2 lovers. Until the L1 Premium disappears expect to see more L1s.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Tweet Date:
2025-10-01 18:09:07 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.92251
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.95735
Price Change Ratio:
3.78%

The 19th largest bank in the world just announced that their regulated stablecoins will use Morpho DeFi on Ethereum L1 Probably somETHing

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

Tweet Date:
2025-09-30 17:00:20 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.66118
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.67203
Price Change Ratio:
0.65%

"in order to secure and decentralize the system, Plasma (at today’s prices) is committing to spending more than $550 million" Yes, I'm sure corp chains having coordination problems (lacking a common reference point) and spending insane amounts for (insignificant) security are the future. lol. ETH is the clearest alpha it almost hurts.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Tweet Date:
2025-09-30 08:55:21 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.08116
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.06192
Price Change Ratio:
-1.78%

Whole Plasma thing is interesting and surely overall good but chain itself is just a sidechain to BTC and doesn't inherit any security from it whatsoever. Only ETH L2s truly scale L1 security. As far as I see it only few people on CT (not speaking of normies) are aware what's coming for ETH ecosystem with L2s, EigenCloud (innovation beast), L1 security (100x ahead of everything else), EigenDA (43M+ tps, MegaETH doing 100k+ realtime tps), ERC 7683 / EIL, EVM distribution, ETH DATs using ETH as productive asset, Trump family all in on ETH, macro looking good, regulation favorable, markets moving onchain, tradfi buy in (Blackrock, Fidelity, Swift etc.), chads like Consensys being link to enterprises etc. etc. list is endless. Endgame is in the most reasonable sense ETH.

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0

Tweet Date:
2025-09-30 08:37:39 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.13138
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.07822
Price Change Ratio:
-4.7%

Every Defi App user gets $1,000 in Bonus HOME. Log in or sign up. Make a swap within 72h to secure it permanently. Check for your $1,000 allocation of Bonus HOME 𝗻𝗼𝘄. Link to the app in the next post. P.S. All emissions are bought back at 150% rate by the DAO. https://t.co/dTeFo7lH8S

Name & Symbol: Defi App ($HOME)
Address: 0x4bfaa776991e85e5f8b1255461cbbd216cfc714f

Tweet Date:
2025-09-27 05:48:54 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.03002
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02976
Price Change Ratio:
-0.85%

Eliza Labs unveils the next phase: $ai16z fully migrates to $elizaOS, empowering freedom to move! What does this mean for the project? - Unlocks the freedom to move capital, letting agents transfer and swap tokens across chains with zero friction - Builds a dynamic ecosystem where resources flow freely, fueled by $elizaOS as an active utility token - Transitions protocols to programmable economies, breaking from static treasuries with autonomous DeFi actions $elizaOS evolves from a fair launch experiment to a liberty-driven asset, redefining how value moves in Web3. Eliza is FREE! Join the community to stay updated @elizaOSc

Name & Symbol: ai16z ($ai16z)
Address: HeLp6NuQkmYB4pYWo2zYs22mESHXPQYzXbB8n4V98jwC

Tweet Date:
2025-09-23 19:11:31 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.09380
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.09390
Price Change Ratio:
0.11%

ETH hasn't even showed what it's capable of. Stablecoins no relevant mainstream adoption ($292B vs. ~$95T global M2) Composable & programmable Defi making use of each other primitives no relevant adoption (also due to lack of L2 interoperability) Tokenization of RWA in earliest stages ($10B vs. $400T global wealth) AI economy only showed that it exists with Virtuals etc. but nothing relevant happened (true unlock will happen with verifiable AI powered by EigenCloud preventing AI rugging users) Corps & govs not doing anything relevant onchain (will be global reference point ~10 years from now on) List goes on. ETH will even melt bull faces.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-09-13 20:14:02 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00543
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00544
Price Change Ratio:
0.09%

Well done @0xngmi and @DefiLlama team. tldr; many RWA TVL metrics are inflated and gamed.

Name & Symbol: Allo ($RWA)
Address: 0x9c8b5ca345247396bdfac0395638ca9045c6586e

Tweet Date:
2025-09-13 17:21:18 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.00539
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.00539
Price Change Ratio:
0.07%

With respect, it's a red flag that the analogy Circle's CTO made for why build an L1 was to AI compute and GPUs. Networks are literally defined by their network effects. That's the entire point. Comparing the network they're building to a phenomenon with zero network effects is a fundamental misunderstanding of what can make Arc successful. If the argument is "Circle will be the only one using the chain" then yeah I get it it's just about scale, throughput, customization etc. but even then L2s are faster and cheaper to run so just do that. I wish Arc and Circle well and would be happy to be proven wrong here, but I'm not seeing how this product strategy will play out.

Name & Symbol: AI Rig Complex ($arc)
Address: 61V8vBaqAGMpgDQi4JcAwo1dmBGHsyhzodcPqnEVpump

Tweet Date:
2025-09-12 18:19:00 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$0.02164
Tweet + 1h Price:
$0.02209
Price Change Ratio:
2.08%

Why MegaETH needs two native dollars? USDm by @ethena_labs + cUSD/stcUSD by @capmoney_ 1. TL;DR • USDm (MegaUSD) = chain-dollar. Built with Ethena. Uses reserve yield to run the sequencer at-cost → sub-cent fees + aligned incentives for the whole network. • Cap (cUSD / stcUSD) = market-dollar. Basket-backed payments (cUSD) + covered yield (stcUSD) via operators underwritten by restakers → scalable, programmable yield for apps/users. Both serve different jobs. Together, they’re the monetary spine for real-time apps on MegaETH. 2. USDm in one slide Issued via Ethena’s Stablecoin-as-a-Service. Backed primarily by USDtb → BlackRock BUIDL via Securitize, with fully on-chain reserve transparency. Reserve yield pays the chain’s OPEX so users don’t. Fees stay low and predictable as usage scales. 3. Why builders want USDm Native across wallets/paymasters/DEX routes → best execution + cheap gas. Apps can plug incentives directly into USDm flows without fighting fee volatility. Perfect "settlement rail" for anything that needs instant, repeatable micro-tx on MegaETH. 4. Cap in one slide (cUSD / stcUSD) • cUSD: payment stablecoin, redeemable 1:1 for a basket of regulated dollar assets (USDC, PYUSD, BUIDL, etc.) in Cap’s Stablecoin Network. • stcUSD: stake cUSD to earn operator-driven yield that’s covered by restakers via EigenLayer/Symbiotic (credible, on-chain recourse). Frontier program live; integrations shipping fast. 5. Why builders want Cap Programmable yield surface: tap market makers, HFT, credit, RWA strategies via operators—without exposing end-users to operator default risk (on-chain slashing/redistribution covers it). Composability on day 1: Pendle markets (PT/YT), lending markets, oracle support. 6. Composability that already exists • Pendle: stcUSD listed; cUSD PT/YT live → pick fixed yield (PT) or floating Caps exposure (YT). • Morpho x Gauntlet: stcUSD + PT-stcUSD markets with curated vaults and looping. • Oracles: Chainlink & RedStone integrated for robust pricing + lower mint costs. 7. Different dollars, different risk/return USDm → conservative, RWA-anchored via USDtb/BUIDL, purpose-built to stabilize fees & UX for the whole chain. stcUSD → market-rate, exogenous yield, covered by restakers; higher expressivity for traders, treasuries, and protocols that want yields beyond T-bill rails. 8. Why MegaETH needs both (not either/or) Macro rail (USDm): keeps the network cheap, predictable, and aligned → unlocks entire UX classes that die at multi-cent gas. Micro alpha (Cap): gives apps/users a yield engine they can compose: fixed vs floating (Pendle), collateral loops (Morpho), and covered operator yield at scale. 9. Real-time chain, real-time dollars MegaETH’s whole point is millisecond latency & 100k TPS class throughput. That makes market-making, liquidations, auctions, CLOBs viable onchain. • USDm keeps fees sub-cent as usage spikes. • Cap lets those apps accumulate yield without taking users’ principal risk. 10. DA & throughput backdrop With EigenDA V2 hitting ~100 MB/s and lower latency, rollups like MegaETH get the DA headroom that high-frequency apps need (GTE, Valhalla, etc.). Liquidity + data + fees must all line up, USDm + Cap help solve two of the three. 11. Treasury playbook for MegaETH teams Settle in USDm for ops, gas, and incentives (minimize fee volatility). Park surplus in cUSD/stcUSD, then ladder PT/YT on Pendle per risk appetite. Use cUSD/stcUSD as collateral in Morpho vaults; loop where safe; farm Caps during Frontier. 12. Governance & guarantees USDm: governed with Ethena stack; reserves largely in tokenized Treasuries (BUIDL) with on-chain transparency; yield redirected to chain OPEX. Cap: self-enforcing (Type III) model, operators/restakers face on-chain penalties; redistribution slashes back to users on fault. 13. What this means for @megaeth_labs • Builders get “always-on” cheap blockspace (USDm) • Users & treasuries get scalable, covered yield (Cap) • Markets get a two-rail dollar system that’s resilient under load and expressive enough for HF apps. If you’re building on MegaETH: design for USDm as your UX rail, Cap as your yield rail and ship like it’s real-time.

Name & Symbol: Morpho Token ($MORPHO)
Address: 0x58d97b57bb95320f9a05dc918aef65434969c2b2

Tweet Date:
2025-09-10 05:32:34 (UTC+0)
Tweet Price:
$1.94940
Tweet + 1h Price:
$1.94593
Price Change Ratio:
-0.18%