People ask me for CA but I know for a fact most people will sell after a couple weeks That’s the problem with mindset of 99% of people on CT Everyone trades on momentum/ borrows conviction and ignore that majority of utility coins = vapor. Either the tech is vaporware or the token value accrual isn’t there but we collectively ignore that BECAUSE THIS WAY YOU CAN HIT A 10X IN A WEEK!! Just pvping eachother to zero while terminals rake in millions Like I have watchlists from all the fucking AI/tech metas and 99% of the coins there are at basically zero now/ no volume Now what if we learned to actually do sensible investments (ownership coin something something), direct our liquidity there and this way encourage more brilliant founders to not go the private circle funding startup way > but give the public access to some equity from ground zero, get a community early on and all the other advantages I will now not go in detail about. What if? What if we would get multiple companies becoming unicorns over a couple years and we got in below 10M valuation? And the biggest holders helped grow the company in some way But no, lets keep frying our dopamine receptors and buy momentun based coins that you know 99% will die in a year I’m genuinely getting tired of it myself, to be honest I’ve shilled many coins alike but am trying to avoid those with attention being the biggest bull factor and more look at the fundamentals around the token I will continue being a voice fighting for this change for the betterment of crypto in general If you like my thoughts, please help sharing this and if you got a take on it, please do share below 🙏

Name & Symbol: TokenFi ($TOKEN)
Address: 0x4507cef57c46789ef8d1a19ea45f4216bae2b528

$CPT sooner or later they will realize how undervalued this is. TL;DR $CPT is an ownership token from a real Swiss company building Contactless Power Transfer (CPT), including wireless power (RF, resonance, laser) for IoT, drones, smart cities, threat sensors, building upgrades, and laser highways. think endless drone flights via fortitude engine and cable free everything. founded by @patpltsang, global investor who helped drive fuboTV to a peak $8B valuation through early investment, strategic financing, and the 2020 merger/IPO process (Tsangs Group got massive returns from it). they recently partnered with @powercastco (RF leaders, sold 30M units in US last 24 months). gives Empulser mature tech, shared IP, exclusive non-US rights (EU/Middle East) for huge scale. the $CPT token is tied to the company via senior debt through the @LaunchOnSoar model, in other words, its an ownership token. right now, holding the token is like investing in private equity or an early-stage startup. because the SOAR model is backed by senior debt, if $CPT gets acquired or goes public via IPO, holders benefit first due to that senior position. A few things that make this comfy to hold: 1. founder doxxed with a great background and track record 2. first CURATED project on @LaunchOnSoar 3. real company and partnership with product soon to be deployed 4. huge upside potential vs. limited downside , great R/R 5. TSANG MODE chart-wise, in my opinion, this is where you accumulate as much as you can while its still cheap (strong demand area). NFA. for more in depth details, check these posts (shoutout to @DineroDom0 and @spyzer): https://t.co/PEGZ5qnffu https://t.co/SayOpw5uiG 9XWWHExgN4yvyLRskzzfcr5AcBaqQ6UtwcDSVpUBsoar

Name & Symbol: Empulser Enterprises ($CPT)
Address: 9XWWHExgN4yvyLRskzzfcr5AcBaqQ6UtwcDSVpUBsoar

Remember when I was bullposting $Gas from 1m to 4m before it got picked up by CT and ran to 60M? I have found another gem. $Eva A very short and simple tldr; it's a better Clawd/Moltbot. Not yet live, so you're very early here. This will get as famous, if not more, as Clawd. -> There was a $Clawd coin that went to 15M+ while having no utility and no dev endorsement. $Eva is fully endorsed and the coin will be integrated in the tech with fees going into her treasury (that Eva controls) Like $Gas technology, you have a whole team of separate agents discuss what to do, plan the approach, carry out the tasks, check each other’s work, and improve the result until it's done. And they applied this tech to trading, building the most advanced trading agent to date. There are many ChatGPT-like agents that can help you find trade setups and analyse the market, but nothing like what Eva will be (look at the image attached). It has so many different angles: - A better Clawd/Moltbot for the vibecoders - The most advanced trading agent for the traders - Sentient being controlling treasury wallet and making decision about that on her own (kinda like $GOAT but way better) - They're building a robot for Eva to become 'human', so even a robotics angle - and more I recommend you to read the quoted article. You'll understand that this is the best front opportunity in the market right now.

Name & Symbol: Goatseus Maximus ($GOAT)
Address: CzLSujWBLFsSjncfkh59rUFqvafWcY5tzedWJSuypump

$nikita looks free here Beeple just dropped a piece on it last night and Nikita bier is the head of product at x. Nikita likes the work as featured on his page. He is an advisor of Solana and is splitting fees with the artist bonegpt who has pinned it to his profile. Bonegpt: pinned post https://t.co/usGBmj3A4m Nikitabier saying to hang his pig depiction at the louvre: https://t.co/G5FZY7kGMV Check out $NIKITA on fomo: https://t.co/NMnnYZxlyj Ca: GJ9LEQZgoxW487LRaRnajr6DWzouswd29EruRqwZBAGS

Name & Symbol: NIKITA BOAR ($NIKITA)
Address: GJ9LEQZgoxW487LRaRnajr6DWzouswd29EruRqwZBAGS

Here you can see a major shift happening in crypto. One of the biggest tokens/teams on Solana ( $MET ) is considering the DRP standard by @LaunchOnSoar = actual ownership. Instead of a token with irregular buybacks or governance (which doesn’t make sense in the first place but I’ll talk about that later on)> you get a token that represents equity: a direct claim on cash flows, assets, and long-term value. Buyback tokens with no underlying incentive beside burning money will be left in the past. I’d rather have my company invest those funds in their business , grow their profits and have the token go up due to perceived company value going up as well. Ownership makes value accrual structural , vs with buybacks, governance or other vague utilities it all depends on uncontrollable variables (ex, how and when team decides to do buyback, make changes in their policy about this, ..) VCs > if we want tradfi to come buy our tokens, ownership token make the most sense. Discounted cash flow, revenue multiples, asset backing, profit margins, comparable companies. All valuation models work on equity based tokens. How will they value tokens that depend on those uncontrollable variables? Capital prefers instruments it knows how to price. Non-equity tokens often rely on : token price → ecosystem growth → token price. And when price falls, the incentives collapse, liquidity dries up, contributors leave & the death spiral begins. That’s how you get all those christmas tree charts & failed businesses which the dumb token structure was a big help at. A token without ownership asks holders to believe: >The team will behave altruistically >Buybacks will continue forever >Governance will matter someday >Value will accrue “somehow” An ownership token says: >Here is what you own >Here is how value flows to you >Here is your downside protection >Here is your upside If you understand early why this makes sense, you’re positioned ahead of the next meta > ownership tokens. The honest end state.

Name & Symbol: Meteora ($MET)
Address: METvsvVRapdj9cFLzq4Tr43xK4tAjQfwX76z3n6mWQL

Another thing I want to say: don’t give someone’s opinion more weight just because they have a large following. I’d go as far as say that you should be more cautious with big accounts—they often have the power to use their audience as exit liquidity. There’s a reason people talk so much about “gem” accounts, and why you’ll see plenty of eight-figure whales with three-digit follower counts. Most KOLs grow through PnL posts. I’ve experienced this myself—my biggest growth came from them. But that has no causal link to how good a trader someone actually is, or whether they shared the idea before the move. Someone buys fartcoin at a $20k market cap, rides it to billions, and suddenly they’re an “expert trader” with 100k+ followers. I’m not saying they aren’t—but you get the point. Just always try to think for yourself and base your opinion on someone off their actions and intentions behind it

Name & Symbol: Fartcoin ($Fartcoin)
Address: 9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump

Updated thesis CPT To anyone new here, welcome, I’m spyzer and am very bullish on the future of ICM. There has been more mindshare shifting towards ‘ownership’ tokens. We’re seeing this currently happening with MetaDAO (futarchy), Star (new- fundraising platform kinda like shark tank), Realms (soon- spin on futarchy model) and Soar (new- equity based tokens through enforceable debt obligation). I will go in depth about Soar, why the launch model works, and its premier launch @EmpulserTech Market conditions may be awful, but that shouldn’t keep you from investing in ownership tokens of (especially web2) revenue generating businesses. There is little onchain liquidity out there and that gives you an advantage. Grab this opportunity with two hands. Good ownership coins will move slower due to lack of liquidity in trenches BUT they will still reach the same valuations they were meant to if they succeed. You just have more time to fill your basket with top ICM picks and accumulate low until VC liquidity starts pouring into the best. My goal with this post is for you to realize the number of opportunities spawning and the r/r being amazing due to the state of crypto. ------- First @LaunchOnSoar . ICM. Equity onchain. Let me explain. A company (we’ll take Empulser as example here) comes to Soar and asks them to help with early stage fundraising. Soar asks the team how much of their equity they want to offer to the market, Empulser chose 7%, this goes into the LP. The rest is locked. The team earns all the trading fees and uses this as fundraising. When the token launched, Empulser signed a ‘DRP’ agreement with Soar. This is basically the ‘utility’ of the token for us holders. A way for every holder to exit >> through a liquidity event. The 7% is seen as a senior debt from Empulser to Soar. When the company goes public (liquidity event) / IPO / merger / .. just any liquidity event, that happens at a certain valuation. Right now, Empulser trades at ~30M valuation. If they IPO at let’s say 100M, the Soar team will get paid out 7M (7% equity = debt). Soar chooses how to distribute this value back to holders, but most viable option is making an application where you can ‘sell’ your tokens at 100M valuation for fiat. In this case the LP/token will naturally reprice to a 100M valuation of the company. Then the agreement between Soar/Empulser is over and Soar sells the tokens into the market to drain the LP. No funds wasted in LP & holders get their money through the Soar application. Empulser chose to burn their previously locked tokens, 93%, (! the tokens in the LP still represent the same amount of equity, 7%, —they just do this for optics, ex: ppl scared team will dump tokens on their head) Basically, you’re buying shares of the company in an early stage to help them with fundraising through the trading fees, these tokens/shares have no interest/dividend whatever. The way you will make money is through the speculation on arbitrage towards liquidity event valuation. ------- Most people misunderstand where the real asymmetric returns in crypto come from > the kingmaker trades, as some say. They don’t come from pretending everything is easy, safe, and “mass adoptable.” Or wrapping slop in a nice shiny package to farm CT. But deep down we all know its worthless. How many AI coins from last year survived and how fewer are thriving? Those kingmaker trades come from information asymmetry, enough research into hard to find/hard to understand information, and by being early with teams solving problems others can’t or won’t touch. ------- I believe the next wave of ICM will present a handful of those trades. And I firmly believe this is one of them. You got an idea of how the launch model of Soar works, now I’ll dive straight into their premier curated launch @Empulser $CPT Empulser is developing Contactless Power Transfer (CPT) systems across three modalities: Basically sending power through the air. >Optical CPT (oCPT) – high-power, laser-based energy transfer >Radio Frequency CPT (RF) – short-range, wireless power in industrial bands >Magnetic Resonance – near-field, contactless industrial power The core insight is simple: There’s intelligent machines (drones, robots, sensors) that are still hindered by batteries. Empulser’s goal is not to remove all batteries everywhere — it’s to remove downtime where downtime is fatal, expensive, or unacceptable. I will explain with a clear example later. About oCPT, this is well regulated (lasers can be dangerous) Empulser isn’t pretending regulation will magically disappear. Their safety model includes: >Auto-termination of the beam upon meaningful obstruction (AI controlled) >Deployment only in controlled or restricted environments Their own words: “First users have to be guys operating in extreme or highly dangerous lines of work.” Question (me): Won’t there be regulatory friction with the AI controlled oCPT? Answer Empulser : Definitely, that’s why only a team that has a Patrick can succeed, because deals will have to be done. ------- Just one of the endless use cases of Empulser’s oCPT technology explained through an example; A real scenario that happened in Switzerland: >A group of hikers got lost in the mountains and needed rescue. What happened: >Drones were deployed to assist rescuers >Battery limitations meant limited coverage Helicopters were sent in The helicopter problem: >Helicopters cost $2–3 million USD >They can only fly ~2 hours before refueling Each mission cycle looks like: >2 hours flying to the search zone >>2 hours searching 2 hours flying back Weather shifts → helicopter grounded You cannot risk losing a crewed aircraft In the end, no one found the hikers in time. Now imagine a different setup: An optical CPT-powered glider drone, costing a lot less. >No crew risk >Can loiter indefinitely >Continuous scanning >No return-to-base cycles >Can operate in weather windows helicopters can’t One drone replaces: >Multiple helicopters >Multiple crews >Repeated sorties >Massive fuel and logistics costs >This could save lives. And this is exactly where oCPT makes sense. Well there must be alternatives to oCPT right? Drone motherships: >Still require logistics >Still have battery churn >Still limited by weather and crew risk Inductive charging: >Requires landing or physical proximity >Not suitable for continuous airborne missions >Needs heavy infrastructure Optical CPT is the only solution that enables true continuous airborne operation in controlled airspace. They also revealed on @MCGlive today that they are filing patents for a new type of engine specifically designed for oCPT. The Fortitude engine. The system converts continuous laser power into thrust, enabling continuous operation without refuelling or recharging. A high efficiency multi-energy approach. More efficient than anything seen before in that field. Demos of this/other products coming ~ this month. Hard to give concrete timelines on stuff like that. ------- 2 other modalities of CPT; RF & Magnetic Empulser is honest about this: RF CPT >Short range (~40m with current hardware) >Directionality is limited Best suited for: >Industrial sensors (which they are developing). On the MCG live they previewed Life Finder, a CPT-enabled wearable for hazardous environments. >Agricultural installations >Fixed environments They’ve even said: “RF directionality is not fantastic with affordable transmitters.” Honesty is something I appreciate a lot, note all these comments come from interaction between the team and me in the public holder chat on Telegram. They are also working on ideas about standing waves/ constructive interference. ------- Why the team matters (at this moment, more than the tech does) This is not just a “ship code and scale” startup. They are not starting from 0 here. This is a regulatory + institutional deal-making business with a killer team. Again: “There will be regulatory friction. That’s why only a team with a Patrick can succeed.” CPT is co-founded by Patrick, he’s a Hong Kong-based investor and entrepreneur, serving as Chairman of the family office Tsangs Group, which focuses on innovation and bridging East & West. He was awarded the Bronze Bauhinia Star by the Hong Kong SAR Government in 2023 for his contributions in charity work. Roman Park - Was multi-regional head for a global consumer brand (currently under NDA/privacy contract so he cannot disclose). From all the questions I’ve seen asked to him, very bullish impression tech/person wise. Tim Ramon - entrepreneur in logistics with multi-decade experience 1x Professor of Wireless Power Transfer out of Fribourg university 1x Prof. Super conductivity out of Fribourg university Empulser is working with Masimo for critical components (these guys don't work with whoever & are valued at 7-8B) ------- Why this fits the soar equity-token model under Soar: >Patrick wants to democratise early stage investing for the public. >Only ~7% of equity is tokenized >Founders retain the rest >Circulating supply acts like recoverable “debt” If Empulser succeeds: >Founders want the token price high (perceived valuation, negotiating leverage, buyback economics, IPO / acquisition optics & buybacks reclaim equity cheaply) >Token holders get exposure to a company long before IPO / acquisition & Soar as a company has its first sign of success. This model fits long-cycle deep-tech far better than slop “utility” tokens. Something you can deploy size in long term with unreal r/r. Risks (for the bears) >Long regulatory timelines >Lumpy, non-linear progress >Opaque government contracts >Key-man dependency >Narrow/unclear initial TAM Why I’m still bullish though >The physics checks out >The constraints/questions are acknowledged and answered greatly >The go-to-market is realistic >Patrick has been handling the transition on how to present himself to holders in an amazing way and went very fast about this. >They ship fast, some products are already in manufacturing phase and they release information in phases which is good for maintaining hype/suspense (degens love that) >And because most traders still dont know about the size of this opportunity. If you are used to investing in slop and the other 100 tokens using buzzwords before went to zero, why even bother researching another one doing ‘power transfer through the air’ in awful market conditions. + there is no instant gratification. Most top traders are dopamine fried btw. That’s exactly (amongst other reasons) why the asymmetry works. CPT is just one of those plays that if you play your cards right, you will never have to place another trade. Real equity of a wireless energy startup with multi-billion family office and cracked team behind it. I didn’t write this post with the main goal in mind for you to buy. I want to educate my followers on what’s happening and help them find the potential unicorn. This is a PvE play. Godspeed. Tsang mode☯️

Name & Symbol: Starpower Network ($STAR)
Address: 0x8fce7206e3043dd360f115afa956ee31b90b787c

FF @tryfomo: @7spyzer turned $160 into $25k+ so far @degnsol personal fan of his buy and hold style @printgod_ trying to be first 1m PNL on fomo @ForeskinBain 5m pnl is the goal or he deletes @notanicecat69 also a fan of his trading style

Name & Symbol: Degen ($DEGEN)
Address: 0x4ed4e862860bed51a9570b96d89af5e1b0efefed

on a good dip right now— read post below 440k $soracle E9qT2T2YHfD67X7VKXZ7PWGnhaZ1nYdEBGbx9xbKpump https://t.co/XrS8O9eg6Y

Name & Symbol: Soracle ($SORACLE)
Address: E9qT2T2YHfD67X7VKXZ7PWGnhaZ1nYdEBGbx9xbKpump

People are starting to realise they partnered with a pharmaceutical company that does 1BN in revenue yearly. In an industry with a cumulative market cap of over 1 trillion First mover advantage $EPIFUN 2AVCEdoprxg6BJS7ARCSXu6DBt2pYGE9YqELNzo4pump

Name & Symbol: EPIFUN ($EPIFUN)
Address: 2AVCEdoprxg6BJS7ARCSXu6DBt2pYGE9YqELNzo4pump

its at 500k been building for months partnership with 7b just announced & 45b company (they already had) & implementing x402 HPePUpxriuXvUYkm9qUn1CaQeN5Z7yNL46XUTytWthvm $SMRT feels similar to the $ACE trade https://t.co/ndmS1DjVrA

Name & Symbol: SmartPractice AI ($SMRT)
Address: HPePUpxriuXvUYkm9qUn1CaQeN5Z7yNL46XUTytWthvm

I think I just found the highest r/r ICM token on Believe. Healthcare x AI with live Epic SMART-on-FHIR integration + public nod from @HeyEpic and a HIPAA BAA with @OpenAI. Token at ~$200k MC. $SMRT (never did a long form post for a token this low but this one truly deserves it) Product Hunt reviews are consistently saying the same things: fast, accurate, massive timesaver; templates by specialty; Epic integration removes copy/paste pain; founders are responsive; in-person demos impressed people https://t.co/PmuKaHpj9S Context: Epic is the hospital EHR (Electronic Health Record). Not just doctors - nurses, managers, leadership, billing, QA, auditors all live in it. Epic reportedly did ~$4.9B revenue in 2023 and the hypotetical valuation could be ~$45b. It dominates U.S. acute care share (~40%). That’s the center of healthcare gravity. Founder @IvyTechMike posted: “We are now officially in partnership with Epic,” with a screen of Epic EHR Integration inside SmartPractice. Epic’s verified account @HeyEpic replied: “SMART 🔥”. Translation: at minimum, their SMART on FHIR app connects to Epic and Epic publicly acknowledged it. That's already rare for a low cap. Why this matters: Epic is where clinical work actually happens: encounters, problem lists, orders, notes, billing codes. If your AI can live inside the Epic workflow, adoption friction drops 90% vs “yet another vendor portal.” https://t.co/FgzhndKzVB OpenAI BAA = underrated catalyst. Many clinics won’t even evaluate without a BAA + zero-retention posture. This checks a procurement box and shortens security reviews. (attached tweet) https://t.co/kyprtIEraJ What SmartPractice is building: • AI scribe → voice-to-SOAP/H&P in seconds • ICD-10 / CPT suggestions • Audio summaries of sessions • Templates by specialty • Write-back to the chart via FHIR/DocumentReference Think Nuance/Abridge vibes, but on Solana. Why that matters: healthcare ROI lives in minutes saved + cleaner coding. • Docs recover hours/week from charting • Fewer denials (better codes) → faster cash • If the note lands in Epic and the provider just e-signs, adoption friction plummets. The flywheel if they ship: Clinics pay SaaS → team allocates 20% to buybacks (as official account said) → buybacks deepen liquidity → narrative strengthens → more clinics → more buybacks. At a sub-$1m MC, even modest revenue punches above its weight on-chain. TLDR: Real tech + rare signals at a tiny mcap = monster optionality. If Believe eco + ICM starts heating again, this is the best r/r token you will find imo. Hard to find a ceiling for this if they execute well. CA: HPePUpxriuXvUYkm9qUn1CaQeN5Z7yNL46XUTytWthvm

Name & Symbol: SmartPractice AI ($SMRT)
Address: HPePUpxriuXvUYkm9qUn1CaQeN5Z7yNL46XUTytWthvm

bought some $epifun @epifuncoin > desci project 100K mcap been listening to their spaces while i was doing research and founder seemed really genuine reason this has yet to reprice is because it was heavily sniped at launch but these bundles are out now (see pictures below) -- cluster 1/2 gone check out the website/founders profile they have partnerships/ 100K+ in treasury assets/ good branding & profile history 2AVCEdoprxg6BJS7ARCSXu6DBt2pYGE9YqELNzo4pump

Name & Symbol: EPIFUN ($EPIFUN)
Address: 2AVCEdoprxg6BJS7ARCSXu6DBt2pYGE9YqELNzo4pump

if you have size and you ain't in $AVICI yet, read this if you have size and you're in, read this because you probably haven't got enough coins imagine being able to invest in Revolut at 30M? think i'm crazy? let's give you some hard facts it's a crypto-powered, internet-native neobank that connects fiat and crypto to let users spend, save, and borrow without giving up ownership of their funds. building out a global reserve currency system with Futarchy governance their biggest competitor onchain ? $XPL -- and it's valued at 700M mcap (that's a 20X+ difference) @AviciMoney did a ICO, raised 35M and refunded 95% because they don't need that much money to build their product. a team that's not greedy if they would've taken it, Avici would be trading at like 500M right now they have thousands of cards ordered, multiple millions spent. average growth of 35%+ MoM. retention rate is 70% MoM below (pictures) are some projections based on user growth and volumes over a 6 month time period. more aggressive growth metrics modeling in premium from potential big partnerships or potential listings. from @crypto_iso common misconception is $AVICI is just a card but people are missing the big picture. stable coins are becoming part of the monetary system as will they become a part of everyday life. + don't forget enterprise adoption versus DAU’s. enterprise is essentially a multiplier for DAU and also a much stickier user base. by creating this ecosystem the volume increases drastically. == massively undervalued vertical accumulation. send it

Name & Symbol: Plasma ($XPL)
Address: 0x405fbc9004d857903bfd6b3357792d71a50726b0